Mikhail Gusarov wrote:
> Ah, this makes much more sense :) Thanks for hint, applied and
> uploaded to
> http://dottedmag.net/debian/python-pytils/python-pytils_0.2.0-1.dsc
good, uploaded.
if you want/need further sponsoring, contact me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsori
Chris Bannister wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexec".
Hi,
is this still the case?
If so, please fix the following things:
* remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog
* replace 'autocompletition' with 'autocompletion' in control
* remove the useless comm
Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "otter".
Hi,
is this still the case?
If so, please fix the following things:
* remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog
* do not use multiple empty lines as a seperator in rules,
one is just enough.
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the package,
>> doesn't have the necessary tools ?
>
> of course it is 'my machine' which fails, but it's your job to take
> care, that everything needed for compiliation (except essen
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Salokine wrote:
>> I'm very interesting to continue these packages !
>
> good, looking forware to hear from you.
Hi,
what is the current state?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
Hi,
what is the current state?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 17:24, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> >> Doesn't it look like the machine, on which you tried to build the
> >> package, doesn't have the necessary tools ?
> >
> > of course it is 'my machine' which fails, but it's your job to
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> I need to setup a VM (UML) which I'll use to test the packages before
> uploading. I'm having some configuration issues (security related) which are
> important before I start using it and I've not looked more into it.
why not use a chroot? it's much easier and faster
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:05:01PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> The point of packaging is to let things work as well as possible by
> default. Its not true to say that kernels and libraries are identical in
> their constraints : and I haven't claimed that. What I have claimed is
> that in no cas
Just got back home late Saturday night, and have been settling in. Just
getting back to packaging xevil now.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:58:06 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the current state?
>
Le mardi 2 janvier 2007 12:55, Daniel Baumann a écrit :
> what is the current state?
Hi,
I think maybe you don't receive my last message "RFS: tremulous-editor" (see
the end of this message for the copy of original message).
I have no answer about licence to use. Upstream author don't contact
Simon Walter wrote:
> I am looking for a comments and a sponsor for the new version 4.55.10-4
> of the package "mailscanner". I am willing to adopt this package.
Hi Simon,
I'm sorry that it took me so long to have a look at your package.
Nevertheless, thanks for giving your love to this package.
Hi,
I'm not expert in these matters, but since nobody answered, I'll give it
a try.
Hynek Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no direct controll over /dev/softsynth and /proc/speakup as
> they are not created by my package.
Sounds like the crucial point to me. As for /proc/speakup, I thin
Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
put it?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
> specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
> vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
> put it?
in the debian directory, and install it with either a dh
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 03:33, Robert Collins wrote:
> I think its a fair and proper assumption that the stack of software
> is all packaged: its very easy to build a packaged, vanilla kernel
> - and doing so can generate appropriate information for dpkg.
But on vserver and xen machines, the ke
Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit :
Le mercredi 15 novembre 2006 08:07, Kel Modderman a écrit :
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 16:48, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) wrote:
Le mercredi 15 novembre 2006 01:24, Kel Modderman a écrit :
Hi mentors,
Hello Kel!
I am seeking a sponsor for the following package,
Daniel-
Re: xevil
Ok. I've added a manpage, tested it, added the gpl blurb to the
copyright file, and updated the standards version. I'm ready for you to
test my package.
For your convenience, here is the link to the dsc:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
-Bra
I have a package (exim4) where debian/rules clean calls
debconf-updatepo. And still people complain that when they rebuild the
package, some po diffs end up in the interdiff.
What am I doing wrong? Where do I call debconf-updatepo, and where do
I not?
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
good, except:
* 3.7.2.2 as standards version is over precise, should be only 3.7.2.
* debian/copyright should have a reference to the full license text in
/usr/share/common-licenses; look at e.g
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a package (exim4) where debian/rules clean calls
> debconf-updatepo. And still people complain that when they rebuild the
> package, some po diffs end up in the interdiff.
> What am I doing wrong? Where do I call debconf-updatepo, and where do
> I n
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 18:20, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > I need to setup a VM (UML) which I'll use to test the packages before
> > uploading. I'm having some configuration issues (security related) which
> > are important before I start using it and I've not looked mor
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Resending message to debian-mentors list.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>> maybe do you want Marvin to finish it? It's not much left, only the
>> build-depends to automake1.9.
>
> Okay!! I've re-uploaded it but haven't been able to check it.
i said automake1.9, not automake (>= 1.9).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:33:34 +1100, Robert Collins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 01:52 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:20:56 +1100, Robert Collins
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > What you need to do is twofold: depend upon the presence of the
>>
26 matches
Mail list logo
