Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-12-13 Thread Jari Aalto
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > When the URL is something like http://www.myniceproject.org, I don't see > > that would be the difference in having the extra space or not. > > Well, it matters to people with 20-character-wide windo

Re: Opinions on CDBS amongst sponsors

2006-12-13 Thread Jari Aalto
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > So the main objections to CDBS are that it hides too much, making it > > hard to know what is actually going on. > > > How does this compare with other helper scripts like debuild and > > pdebuild? > > Those

Re: aspell-uz: new upstream release (0.6.0)

2006-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mashrab Kuvatov wrote: >> additionally, i recommend you rename the source package name to >> uzbek-wordlist, since source package names with points as seperator is >> uncommon and looks very ugly. > > Yes. I planned it for the next release. for the next release? can't you change it now? otherwise

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * changelog has got an empty line at the end again > > * you r

Re: RFS: hostname -- utility to set/show the host name or domain name

2006-12-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Jarim Am 2006-12-04 13:21:39, schrieb Jari Aalto: > * Remove trailing space from -a output. (Closes: #390527) Thanks for correcting this annoying Bug. Thanks, Greetings and nice Day Michelle Konzack Systemadministrator Tamay Dogan Network Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

Re: netcdf packages

2006-12-13 Thread Warren Turkal
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 19:35, you wrote: > Regarding the use of gfortran -- are you aware that g77 and gfortran > produce object code with somewhat incompatible ABIs? See my previous > emails on this topic here: Yes, I am aware. Since there is neither a fortran policy nor a good record of be

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * changelog has got an empty line at the end again >

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hi Daniel, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> Daniel, >> >> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >> warnings also. :-) > > Everything well, except the following two regressions: > > * changelog has got an empty line at the end again >

Re: netcdf packages

2006-12-13 Thread Warren Turkal
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 18:41, Warren Turkal wrote: > Uploaded to [1]. Another new package release @ [1]. This is the first set that is totally lintian clean. Changes: netcdf (3.6.2-beta4-1~pre3) unstable; urgency=low . * added symlinks for libraries in /usr/lib * changed conflicts s

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-12-13 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > > Daniel Baumann wrote: > >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >>> Daniel, >>> >>> Thanks for all your points. I've re-uploaded it and now there are no lintian >>> warnings also. :-) >> Everything well, except the following two regressions: >> >> * changelog ha

Re: netcdf packages

2006-12-13 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 10:55, Warren Turkal wrote: > I think that we should just go for it. W00T! KST can actually plot netcdf graphs after the upgrade in library. It just crashed on all my netcdf files before. This is another reason to upgrade the library. Unfortunately, it lookes like

Re: Homepage-field in description

2006-12-13 Thread Russ Allbery
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does the Lintian issua an information message of any kinf for the > Homepage: field? If it would, the maintainers could possibly pay more > attention. Not many are aware of the spcae or "two space" reason for > long URLs. No. There's a proposed patch that