Re: RFS: exaile

2006-12-04 Thread Arjan Oosting
Op ma, 04-12-2006 te 08:52 +0100, schreef Tobias Richter: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Nov 03 2006, Tobias Richter wrote: > > > It's waiting for ftpmaster approval in the NEW queue: > > > > > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > > > > Unfortunately, it still seems to be there. :-( I wou

RFS: hostname -- utility to set/show the host name or domain name

2006-12-04 Thread Jari Aalto
I'm looking for sponsor: - lintian clean - pbuilder tested - Upload would close all open bugs. Package name: hostname ITA/ITP URL : http://bugs.debian.org/400078 * Package bugs URL: http://bugs.debian.org/hostname Mentors URL : dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main

Re: RFS: hostname -- utility to set/show the host name or domain name

2006-12-04 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: >I'm looking for sponsor: Package hostname is not orphaned. Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: fspanel -- minimalist panel for X

2006-12-04 Thread Jari Aalto
Esteban Manchado Velázquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 12:11:34AM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > > > > I'm looking for sponsor: > > - lintian clean > > - pbuilder tested > > - very low maintenance > > - No open bugs > > According to its homepage, it's no longer develope

[cancelled] RFS: hostname -- utility to set/show the host name or domain name

2006-12-04 Thread Jari Aalto
Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > >I'm looking for sponsor: > > Package hostname is not orphaned. Please ignore ITA. The changes have been submitted to current maintainer. Jari -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

Re: RFS: hostname -- utility to set/show the host name or domain name

2006-12-04 Thread Damyan Ivanov
Hi, Jari, I've noticed two small problems with the changelog that you may want to fix. -=| Jari Aalto, 4.12.2006 13:21 |=- > hostname (2.94) unstable; urgency=low > > * Mention that /etc/hostname should only contain domain name and not > the full FQD. (Closes: #253956) "domai

looking for a sponsor for a bugfix upload

2006-12-04 Thread Iustin Pop
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for a FTBFS release of python-pylibacl. Changelog: * New upstream release (add support for building on GNU/kFreeBSD, removes some warnings) (Closes: #401316). * Acknowledge NMU by Pierre Habouzit. Thanks! (Closes: #373342). How to get: dget http://www.

Re: looking for a sponsor for a bugfix upload

2006-12-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
Iustin Pop wrote: > dget http://www.k1024.org/apt/pool/python-pylibacl_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes * changelog and copyright have a useless empty line at the end of the file. * for consistency, i suggest to rename python-pylibacl.docs to docs. * installing README through docs makes not much

RFS: scim-qtimm and scim-bridge for ZhengPeng Hou

2006-12-04 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, I do not think I can be technically sure to upload this with my limitted time too. Besides, I do not use Qt. Also have you checked current Qt shipped with Debian is compatible with scim-qtimm. Last time I checked about a year or so ago, Qt nneeded patch to use scim-qtimm. How are you goin

Re: looking for a sponsor for a bugfix upload

2006-12-04 Thread Iustin Pop
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:35:34PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > Iustin Pop wrote: > > dget http://www.k1024.org/apt/pool/python-pylibacl_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes > > * changelog and copyright have a useless empty line at the end of the > file. Done > * for consistency, i suggest to rename

Re: looking for a sponsor for a bugfix upload

2006-12-04 Thread Daniel Baumann
Iustin Pop wrote: >> * installing README through docs makes not much sense, imho. > Hmm, not sure about this. You mean using the install rule and not > binary-arch? well, README does not contain usefull information, so i think it's not worthwile to install it into the system. you may remove it f

Re: RFS: exaile

2006-12-04 Thread François Févotte
Hi Rogério, On 12/4/06, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, it still seems to be there. :-( I would love to get it in Debian proper [*]. We actually had problems with the first upload, which got refused by the ftp masters due to an architecture-dependant file under /usr/sha