On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > * Package name: tstat
>
> IANAL (I am not a lawyer), but I wonder if we shouldn't ask debian-legal
> about these license clauses for erf.c:
>
> 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of t
Dear mentors,
Can someone assist in explaining how to build a Debian package based on a
web application. The package I would like to build is from
http://www.phpip.net [phpip is a complete IPv4 IPAM (IP address
management) suite].
Thanks,
mearls
--
Michael Earls
http://www.vermeer.org
http:
On 2006-08-21 15:44:52, Michael Earls wrote:
Can someone assist in explaining how to build a Debian package based
on a
web application. The package I would like to build is from
You can start with these links, that was how I did:
http://women.debian.org/wiki/index.php/English/PackagingTutoria
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:52:52PM +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> On 2006-08-21 15:44:52, Michael Earls wrote:
> >Can someone assist in explaining how to build a Debian package based
> >on a
> >web application. The package I would like to build is from
> You can start with these links, that was
Hi Sandro, mentorees and Mentors!
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anymeal".
I would love to sponsor it, but I have a huge backlog, as I had a Murphy
stroke on my main developement machine's power supply, and no suitable
replacement until half an hour ago.
Please p
Hello Andreas,
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 22:31 +0200, Andreas Bresser wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.2a+repack-1
> of my package "spe".
I've taken a look. I haven't uploaded it yet, because I've spotted the
following things that could be improved:
* Most importantly, 0.8
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 16:53 +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "anymeal".
>
> I would love to sponsor it, but I have a huge backlog, as I had a Murphy
> stroke on my main developement machine's power supply, and no suitable
> replacement until ha
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 15:48 +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote:
> I fnished my package for a set of tools to manage buttons and LCD screen
> from Sun Cobalt Servers Series.
> These tools were released by Sun under GPL/LGPL license after EOL of the
> Cobalt Serie. A Gentoo developper improved them
Hello Varun,
On Sat, 2006-08-19 at 14:51 +0530, Varun Hiremath wrote:
> Hello Mentors,
> I am looking for comments and suggestions about my package ipodslave:
Ok, here's some comments:
* You're still using standards-version 3.6.2 while current policy is
3.7.2.
* You install the docs NEWS an
Package: rioutil
Licence: LGPL
Description: rioutil is a program for interfacing with MP3 players produced by
Sonic Blue, Diamond MM and Digital Networks NA. It is known to work with a
number of models from the Rio series, namely 600, 800, 900, Riot, S-Series and
psa[play. Rio models Nitrus, C
Hello Michael,
On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 04:26 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tptest3".
Good work, but I haven't uploaded it yet, because of the following
issues:
* Re-read your changelog entry. You've left some boilerplate :)
* In debian/control, you s
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:41 -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> Description: rioutil is a program for interfacing with MP3 players
> produced by Sonic Blue, Diamond MM and Digital Networks NA. It is
> known to work with a number of models from the Rio series, namely 600,
> 800, 900, Riot, S-Series and ps
Hello Thijs,
On Mon, 21 Aug, 2006 at 07:01:30PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> * You're still using standards-version 3.6.2 while current policy is
> 3.7.2.
I have changed it now.
> * You install the docs NEWS and thoughts.txt which are (essentially)
> empty; that's not useful.
I have rem
A URL to the source file:
http://umn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/rioutil/rioutil-1.5.0.tar.bz2
-Nathan
On Monday, August 21, 2006, at 11:57AM, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:41 -0600, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
>> Description: rioutil is a program for interfaci
Hi Thijs,
Thanks for your comments they are indeed such things I look for. Some
of them were solved in a newer version and the newest available version
which you can find here has included fixes for your comments (I don't
know how to replace an already uploaded package?). The newest version
I've got some small comments:
sure
The docs you're installing in the file 'debian/docs': the file NEWS is
zero-byte, so let's not install it. The file README contains no
information relevant to Debian users and not already available, so let's
keep that out aswell.
removed both
The file faq
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xindy".
* Package name: xindy
Version : 2.2~beta2-1
Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xindy.org
* License : GPL
Section : text
It builds these binary packa
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 22:45 +0200, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> > * You install both README and README.Debian, which have essentially
> > the same content.
> >
> A README file is mandatory using autotools. But to eliminate
> redundancy I have renamed README.1st to README. README now contains
>
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 23:03 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Because of these are small issues I've uploaded this version now.
>
> Thanks you very much! Can I ask you again for further release of anymeal?
Please ask at the list; I read it and will respond when I'm available to
sponsor, but when not,
On 2006-08-22 00:12:14, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
You are talking about the upstream source, I'm about the Debian
package.
Ah, now I understand it better:-)
Whatevery autotools mandates, you still don't need to install empty
or
duplicate documents in the Debian package (i.e.: list them in
debian
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:37:43PM +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xindy".
>
> * Package name: xindy
> Version : 2.2~beta2-1
> Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.xindy.org
>
Le Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:20:35AM +0200, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:21:47AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> > 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software
> > must display the following acknowledgement:
> >This product includes soft
Dear Mentors,
I'm packaging the new shiny beta version of kmobiletools
(www.kmobiletools.org).
This version is really different from the actual stable, and implements
two library and a plugins.
The first library is libkmobiletools, the foundation library of the sw.
The second is libkmobiletools
Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the inspection of the new code and the discover of the new library
> I have a problem with the design of the new package structure, because
> if I follow the splitting scheme written above I'll have:
>
> kmobiletools - the real application;
>
On Tuesday 22 August 2006 02:09, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
>
> Can kmobliletools-plugin-kontact (or anything else out there based
> on libkmobiletools) operate independantly of the main application? If
> not, the only split might need to be the kontact plugin vs.
> kmobiletools, to avoid kmobile
Francesco Pedrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, then I will have:
>
> kmobiletools
> libkmobiletools
> libkmobiletools-dev
> and kmobiletools-plugin-kontact.
>
> It seems fine, I can always split the phone engines in a separated
> package when the GAMMU engine (and maybe others) will be added
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 05:55:34AM IST, Paul Wise
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> incoherently babbled:
> There are some more problems with the package:
>
> * you seem to misunderstand postinst - postinst is run when users
> *install* the package onto their systems. also, please think
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
