Re: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
Marcus Better wrote: > I am not a DD. Should I ask someone to do an NMU on these packages? I have not yet carefully looked at your patches, but I would be happy to do so, and upload and so on... But finding a long term Maintainer would be much better. Would you be willing invest the time and effor

patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
Hi, I made an update of a Debian package: zope2.9 The source is here: deb ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ testing main deb-src ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ testing main deb ftp://infogerance.locataire-serveur.info/debian/ unstable main deb-src ftp://infogerance

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Thursday 19 January 2006 10:55 am, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > I have a problem on it: > The patch located in 'debian/patches' is not applied. > What could I do to diagnosys the reason the patch is not applied? You can do run dpatch manually to diagnose the problem. dpatch apply-all --ve

Re: RFS: vrweb -- A VRML browser and editor [uploaded]

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 09:24 pm, Stan Vasilyev wrote: > VRweb is a VRML 1 browser that you can use to browse a Virtual Reality > World (WRL). > > This release fixes two bugs from BTS and a nasty build bug. The Debian > sources are available at: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/v

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread John Lightsey
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 19:55 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > I have a problem on it: > The patch located in 'debian/patches' is not applied. > What could I do to diagnosys the reason the patch is not applied? You need to change debian/rules in a few places. 1) You should have "unpatch" ad

RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
I recently adopted xdialog, packaged the new upstream version and made significant overhauls to the package. This release fixes five bugs. The Debian sources are here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdialog/ The ITA is here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348161

Re: RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Stan Vasilyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-19 22:56]: > I recently adopted xdialog, packaged the new upstream version and made > significant overhauls to the package. This release fixes five bugs. > > The Debian sources are here: > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xdialog/ >

Re: RFS: xdialog -- X11 replacement for the text util dialog

2006-01-19 Thread Stan Vasilyev
On Thursday 19 January 2006 02:07 pm, Nico Golde wrote: > > Package seems to be in a good shape (not tried to build), > but what makes me wonder is the 20_no_msg.dpatch file. > But imho the following "hack" should be a real fix forwarded > to upstream. > +/* no-g-msgs hack */ > +void qqGLogFunc(con

RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Christian Aichinger
Hi, one of my packages, wmcpuload, needs a reupload due to the xlibs-dev removal (to fix #347046). There were only minimal changes made to the version currently in the archive, the package is lintian and linda clean. The package is available at: http://greek0.net/debian/packages/wmcpuload/4/ TIA

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread Rakotomandimby Mihamina
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:09 -0600, John Lightsey wrote: > 1) You should have "unpatch" added to "clean". Look at the way it's > done in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/rules/rules.new.non-dh.gz I got this: $ dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot dpkg-buildpackage: source package is zope2.9 dpkg-buildpackag

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 20 January 2006 01:17, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcus Better wrote: > > I am not a DD. Should I ask someone to do an NMU on these packages? > > I have not yet carefully looked at your patches, but I would be happy to > do so, and upload and so on... But finding a long term Main

RE: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Miriam Ruiz
It seems that the webpage you mention has changed and redirects you to http://seiichisato.jp/dockapps/ Greetings, Miry __ LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice

Re: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
tags 347046 pending thanks Christian Aichinger wrote: > one of my packages, wmcpuload, needs a reupload due to the xlibs-dev > removal (to fix #347046). A sponsored upload is on its way. Thanks for fixing this! -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `' Prou

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
Russell Coker wrote: > I don't have the time that this package needs (as is probably > obvious). I welcome a package takeover by someone such as Amaya. Hi there, Russell. While I am not interested in maintanining it, I will be happy to mentor Marcus, and be his sponsor too. If this is fine with y

Re: patches application

2006-01-19 Thread John Lightsey
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 01:02 +0100, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:09 -0600, John Lightsey wrote: > > 1) You should have "unpatch" added to "clean". Look at the way it's > > done in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/rules/rules.new.non-dh.gz > I got this: > > $ dpkg-buildpa

Re: RFS: wmcpuload - Dockapp that displays the current CPU usage

2006-01-19 Thread Amaya
> A sponsored upload is on its way. Looks like I was too fast to reply and Marc too slow to tag this pending ;) He will do the upload instead. Sorry for the noise -- .''`. sleep: command not found : :' : `. `' Proudly running unstable Debian GNU/Linux `- w

Re: Bug#243941: How to help with neglected packages

2006-01-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Friday 20 January 2006 11:44, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russell Coker wrote: > > I don't have the time that this package needs (as is probably > > obvious). I welcome a package takeover by someone such as Amaya. > > Hi there, Russell. While I am not interested in maintanining it, I wil