Feifei Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I wanted to delete the date which stored in debconf database when
> purge a package. So I added "db_purge" both in prerm and postrm
> scripts, but it seemed not work.
>
> Did I miss something? Any hints appreciated.
Did you load confmodule?
R
On Thursday 10 November 2005 18:50, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> * Package name: ksudoku
> Version : 0.3
> Upstream Author : Francesco Rossi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://ksudoku.sourceforge.net
> * License : GPL
> Description : sudoku puzzle generator/solv
On 11/11/05, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feifei Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I wanted to delete the date which stored in debconf database when
> > purge a package. So I added "db_purge" both in prerm and postrm
> > scripts, but it seemed not work.
> >
> > Did
On 11/10/05, Wolfgang Baer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (1)
> Architecture: any
>
> Java packages are Architecture: all ! This change will also mean to
> use Build-Depends-Indep and to move the build stuff into the
> binary-indep: target in the debian/rules file.
Done.
> (2)
> Depends: gij | kaff
Thanks for all the clues. I'll continue the thread on
http://bugs.debian.org/295760 to see if we can get libming going on, and
my package too (BTW my package is op-panel [1]).
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323689
El jue, 10-11-2005 a las 16:06 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 09:09:03AM +0100, Marc Leeman wrote:
> Last week, I made packages for Quake III. For these, I used the work
> great of Jamie, the quake II maintainer and adjusted it: the package is
> split in quake3 and quake3-data.
Do you know of any efforts to create DFSG q3a content, wh
Hi all,
because I wasn't subscribed I answer with a completely new mail, now I
am. Sorry for the confusion in the thread view of your email app.
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:25:35PM +0100, Timo Steuerwald wrote:
Hi all,
I try to create packages for sipX from sipfoundry.org. This is a PBX
lik
In gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors, you wrote:
>> Last week, I made packages for Quake III. For these, I used the work
>> great of Jamie, the quake II maintainer and adjusted it: the package is
>> split in quake3 and quake3-data.
>
> Do you know of any efforts to create DFSG q3a content, which wou
Timo Steuerwald:
> >Timo Steuerwald:
> >>I try to create packages for sipX from sipfoundry.org. This is a PBX
> >>like asterisk and is composed of a few subprojects like sipXportLib,
> >>sipXtackLib...
> >>I now tried to create a package for sipXportLib.
> >Firstly, you should know that ./debian/
Justin Pryzby wrote:
It _used to_ be the case that it was an environment variable set (and
exported) by ./debian/rules, but then people realized that under this
configuration, debhelper would behave differently when run by the
makefile than it would when run manually (for testing, debugging,
On Friday 11 November 2005 03:45 am, Christoph Haas wrote:
> - The orig.tar.gz differs from the upstream tarball. It's just a
> rename of the directory inside and the admin/CVS directory is
> removed. It's a religious issue but I would rather leave the original
> upstream archive intact. The
I've packaged new upstream version of this orphaned package
(and taged it's orphaning bug as ITA)
source package at:
http://www.ageda.net/debian/secpanel/
suggestions/sponsor welcome
maybe it's not the most popular package in debian, but has some users...
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/popcon-g
> > Do you know of any efforts to create DFSG q3a content, which would allow
> > migration into main? (just curious)
>
> There is, but it's in very early stage:
> http://www.planetgargoyle.com/openarena/
emphasis on *very* :)
If it matures, I'll add it as an alternative, next to installation of
I've been playing around with packaging up some of my projects for
debian. I have gotten it to work, but I'm still having problems
understanding some of the features that are available (for instance it
took me forever to learn about the .config file).
Is there any kind of tutorial or guide that ex
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:25:18PM -0500, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote:
> I've been playing around with packaging up some of my projects for
> debian. I have gotten it to work, but I'm still having problems
> understanding some of the features that are available (for instance it
> took me for
On Friday 11 November 2005 18:55, Ryan Schultz wrote:
> On Friday 11 November 2005 03:45 am, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > - The orig.tar.gz differs from the upstream tarball. It's just a
> > rename of the directory inside and the admin/CVS directory is
> > removed. It's a religious issue but I wou
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 02:25:18PM -0500, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote:
> I've been playing around with packaging up some of my projects for
> debian. I have gotten it to work, but I'm still having problems
> understanding some of the features that are available (for instance it
> took me for
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:39 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> A sufficiently generalized piece of documentation would be great,
> though. Suggestions for content: conffile handling (dpkg.org),
> maintscripts (debian women? I don't fully grok these yet!), and
> upgrade handling with eg. split packages
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:02:56PM -0500, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:39 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > A sufficiently generalized piece of documentation would be great,
> > though. Suggestions for content: conffile handling (dpkg.org),
> > maintscripts (debi
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:02:56PM -0500, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:39 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> > A sufficiently generalized piece of documentation would be great,
> > though. Suggestions for content: conffile handling (dpkg.org),
> > maintscripts (debi
On Friday 11 November 2005 02:30 pm, Christoph Haas wrote:
> My bad. Indeed there is a ksudoku.desktop file which is installed. IMHO in
> the wrong place though. It should be located in /usr/share/applications
> instead. (Although I admit I don't know where that's properly documented
> in the polic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/2005 07:02 PM, Derek "The Monkey" Wueppelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:39 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
>
>>A sufficiently generalized piece of documentation would be great,
>>though. Suggestions for content: conffile handling (dpk
22 matches
Mail list logo
