On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:51:17PM -0400, Brett Meadors wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am possibly interested in finding a sponsor. I would like to help with
> documentation, or maybe help with PR. I can provide more information if
> necessary. I haven't written much documentation for Open source projects,
Brett Meadors wrote:
Hi,
Hi Brett
I am possibly interested in finding a sponsor. I would like to help
with documentation, or maybe help with PR. I can provide more
information if necessary. I haven’t written much documentation for Open
source projects, but use words well and can provide a sim
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fathi BOUDRA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor to my qt4lab package.
qt4lab is an already promising project and collaborate
with qwt project.
You can find my package :
http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
best regards,
Fathi
* Pa
hi,
i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Brett,
* Brett Meadors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-12 07:53]:
> I am possibly interested in finding a sponsor. I would like to help with
> documentation, or maybe help with PR. I can provide more information if
> necessary. I haven't written much documentation for Open source projects,
>
Hi,
> The package files are available from http://www.hemamu.com/hemamu/debian/ .
>
I've looked at the directory.
I can point out that you have only created a Debian native package,
You will need an upstream file as
../tinywm_1.3.orig.tar.gz when building.
regards,
junichi
--
Ju
Hi,
The author of one of the packages I was packaging for
my own use has asked me to be the maintainer of the
debian's package. The problem that I found is that in
latest versions he includes his own version of
debian's directory inside the original tar.gz file as
you download it from the web.
I'
It then becomes a native debian package with no -# revisions.
C.S.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Hi,
The author of one of the packages I was packaging for
my own use has asked me to be the maintainer of the
debian's package. The problem that I found is that in
latest versions he includes
also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2044 +0200]:
> I've tried to explain to him the reasons behind doing
> it the proper way, with a diff file, but I don't think
> I was able to do that too well. Quoting him: "The
> reason I added debian subdirectory is to distribute it
> with t
also sprach Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2047 +0200]:
> It then becomes a native debian package with no -# revisions.
No, it does not necessarily. You can have an empty .diff.gz file,
which would make sense in this case.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 20:44 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The author of one of the packages I was packaging for
> my own use has asked me to be the maintainer of the
> debian's package. The problem that I found is that in
> latest versions he includes his own version of
> debian's directory
Hi!
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 20:44, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> "The
> reason I added debian subdirectory is to distribute it
> with the source files."
>
> Any suggestions on how to deal with that?
For sam2p I created my own orig.tar.gz with the debian subdirectory
renamed to debian.dist. I don't delet
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 21.16, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2044 +0200]:
> > I've tried to explain to him the reasons behind doing
> > it the proper way, with a diff file, but I don't think
> > I was able to do that too well. Quoting him: "The
>
also sprach Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2109 +0200]:
> For sam2p I created my own orig.tar.gz with the debian subdirectory
> renamed to debian.dist.
Then it's not .orig anymore. The MD5 sum will differ.
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`
also sprach Adrian von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2135 +0200]:
> I think having the debian/ directory in the upstream source makes
> sense if the packager works closely with the upstream author (or
> is the same), ideally the package maintainer should have write
> access to upstream's s
On Apr 12, 2005 4:44 PM, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, but there is no point in having ./debian available upstream.
> It's backwards.
It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian
directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and test
their
also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12. +0200]:
> It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian
> directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and
> test their software while developing it.
Huh? Why not just use ./Makefile?
> What
On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 22:40 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12. +0200]:
> > It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian
> > directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and
> > test their softwar
also sprach Steve Halasz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2249 +0200]:
> In my case some upstream developers were debian users who liked to
> be able to build debs from CVS. This has been helpful since they
> can make sure the app will work ok in debian before they release.
> It's not strictly neces
martin f krafft wrote:
What does not make a lot of sense is to release the .tar.gz with
the ./debian directory, as Steve Halasz said, it's perfectly valid
to have it in CVS the important point would be to convince them
not to include it in the release.
I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the
I demand that martin f krafft may or may not have written...
> also sprach Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.
> +0200]:
>> It makes sense for software developers to have their own ./debian
>> directory so that they can use debian/rules binary to compile and test
>> their soft
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:27:52PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the Debian maintainer, not of
> >the upstream. Unless you are developing software *for* *Debian*
> >(native), there is no reason why you should bother with ./debian at
> >all.
> >
> What a
Hi all,
It seems a hard problem to understand what a native and a non-native
debian package is. And get through the trouble if upstream provide a
debian directory in the source. I'll try to explain:
1. Non-Native Debian Package
A non-native debian source package contains a dsc, diff.gz and a
ori
also sprach Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2327 +0200]:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/04/msg00106.html ). The
> debian/ directory is in CVS, naturally.
Use a branch!
> It is currently distributed in the .tar.gz file. Should it be
> removed?
Yes, in my opin
also sprach Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.12.2351 +0200]:
> A native package contains only a dsc and a orig.tar.gz file.
Actually, it's not called .orig.tar.gz, just .tar.gz
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL P
Hello,
for some hours I have tried to compile a SARGE source under SARGE
with:
8<
SARGE base-install
apt-get install build-essential fakeroot
apt-get build-dep
apt-get source
cd
$EDIT debian/changelog
dpkg-buildpackage ...
8<-
> "Stefan" == Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Stefan> For sam2p I created my own orig.tar.gz with the debian
Stefan> subdirectory renamed to debian.dist. I don't delete it because
Stefan> the upstream changelog is in there (installed with
Stefan> "dh_installchangelogs debian.
> "martin" == martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
martin> Tell him that the ./debian directory has no value when the
martin> software is available from the Debian archive and that you need
martin> to make modifications to it frequently. ...
It may be of value to users of stable
> "Miriam" == Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Miriam> Hi, The author of one of the packages I was packaging for my own
Miriam> use has asked me to be the maintainer of the debian's
Miriam> package. The problem that I found is that in latest versions he
Miriam> includes his own version
Each remedy at 1.81 USD per draught !!
http://Orestes.brillianthealth.info/?determinedxtvuyFrancizezsvnineteens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.04.13.0234 +0200]:
> It may be of value to users of stable who want to make their own
> package of the latest version of the software for some reason.
Then they should bug the maintainer to have it go into unstable.
--
Please do not send copies o
31 matches
Mail list logo
