Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The author(s) can spend free time in any way the author(s) wish to.
I'm glad to learn that.
> Likewise, Blars and myself are free to tell authors that what they
> have written appears to be a waste of their time when Free alternative
> "foo" exists. Jus
Foreword: you're lucky I happened to relate your mail to mine. Please do
the necessary so that your future messages actually appear as replies to
the messages you are replying to (hint: the "References" field does the
job).
"Richard A. Hecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You used a judgement to
Hi,
Just in case anybody is also reading -project...
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
> Debian decides to add it to to their archives.
^
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f
Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> "Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >Do we have to split the alsa-tools source into two packages, one free
>> >and one non-free/contrib? It will make it a bit harder.
>> No.
>
> Unfortunately, that is not the ca
Hello mentors,
I packaged an MPEG/DVB analyzer program called dvbsnoop and I am looking
for a sponsor. dvbsnoop is licensed under the GPL and is available here:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dvbsnoop/
A description of dvbsnoop:
dvbsnoop is a DVB sniffer program to monitor, analyze,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Just in case anybody is also reading -project...
>
>
> Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
> > Debian decides to add it to to their archives.
> ^
In some
Am Dienstag, den 01.02.2005, 18:05 +0800 schrieb Cameron Patrick:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
> > Just in case anybody is also reading -project...
> >
> >
> > Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
> > > Debian decide
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> Just in case anybody is also reading -project...
>>
>>
>> Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I do think that it should be objectivly compared with vacation before
>> > Debian decides to add it to to their arch
> But if the plugins are only loaded by maserver, you
> don't need to link the
> plugins against libmaserver *at all*, statically or
> dynamically. This was
> the point from my earlier message.
>
> If you statically link libmaserver into maserver,
> you get a minimal
> *reduction* in the total in
> Try lintian -i: you'll see this type of thing:
>
> A shared object was identified in a library
> directory
> (i.e. a directory in the standard linker path)
> which
> doesn't have a SONAME. This is usually an error.
Thanks, yes it seems that the lintian error means what
you're saying.
ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin Torsten,
I can sponsor you. Here are the things that I think should be corrected
before uploading:
- - Both packages use dh_python so they must build-depend on "python".
- - python-elementtree and python-celementtree are only dummy packages
w
Please, if you have time, take a look at this package.
It's all available at
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/rstutsma/debian/
I've done everything I know to prepare it for inclusion. There is some
possibility that the package will become smaller in future iterations
pending the upstream change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bastian Kleineidam schrieb:
| Moin Torsten,
|
| I can sponsor you. Here are the things that I think should be corrected
| before uploading:
|
| - Both packages use dh_python so they must build-depend on "python".
|
| - python-elementtree and python-cele
Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I can not put that .so inside the package, the
> other solution might be getting 3 packages from
> maserver: libmaserver, libmaserver-dev and maserver
> itself. libmaserver would have the shared library and
> libmaserver-dev the header files to make new
Disclaimer: I am Chris's day job boss, the person who originally
suggested Chris package auto-reply.
Back in August, I choose to download the tarball for auto-reply instead
of using vacation, despite the fact that I had used vacation for some
years.
As far as I can tell, vacation requires a ho
Hello,
I have a question about the encoding of the files in the Debian
subdirectory. AFAIK it's recommended to use ASCII only in debian/control
(AFAIK the policy does not contain a note about this problem). But what
to do with debian/copyright and special characters in names? Is there
any recommen
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:27:53PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> I have a question about the encoding of the files in the Debian
> subdirectory. AFAIK it's recommended to use ASCII only in debian/control
> (AFAIK the policy does not contain a note about this problem). But what
> to do with debian/
Le Mar 1 Février 2005 19:27, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> Use UTF-8, use only the latin alphabet
why then use utf8 ?
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgp7PzY5ai8qN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le Mar 1 F?vrier 2005 19:27, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a ?crit :
> > Use UTF-8, use only the latin alphabet
>
> why then use utf8 ?
There are hunderds, maybe even up to a thousand latin characters.
ASCII is only a very small subset o
* Package name: libtranslate
Version : 0.99
Upstream Author : Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/libtranslate/
* License : DFSG-compilant
Description : library for translating texts and webpages
libtranslate is a library fo
* Package name: gnome-translate
Version : 0.99
Upstream Author : Jean-Yves Lefort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/libtranslate/gnome-translate/
* License : GPL
Description : natural language translator for GNOME
GNOME Translator is a natu
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:32:04PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Mar 1 F?vrier 2005 19:27, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a ?crit :
> > > Use UTF-8, use only the latin alphabet
> >
> > why then use utf8 ?
>
> There are hunderd
Le Mar 1 Février 2005 19:32, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:29:22PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le Mar 1 F?vrier 2005 19:27, Jeroen van Wolffelaar a ?crit :
> > > Use UTF-8, use only the latin alphabet
> >
> > why then use utf8 ?
>
> There are hunderds, maybe eve
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:38:40PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> I wonder when one stops thinking of a character as in the latin script
> then. Obviously Bopomofo is out, and closer to home, so would Cyrillic,
> but the Latin page in unicode has some pretty weird ones, like:
>
> ?? or ??
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Respectively from Latin Extended-B and Latin Extended-A. As I said,
> there is no official policy on it, to the letter of the policy any
> non-ASCII is currently forbidden.
The only clear statement I see is on debian/changelo
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:27:53PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> I have a question about the encoding of the files in the Debian
>> subdirectory. AFAIK it's recommended to use ASCII only in debian/control
>> (AFAIK the policy does not contain
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050201 21:55]:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:27:53PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> >> I have a question about the encoding of the files in the Debian
> >> subdirectory. AFAIK it's recommended to use ASCII
Wouter van Heyst wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
As I said,
there is no official policy on it, to the letter of the policy any
non-ASCII is currently forbidden.
The only clear statement I see is on debian/changelog.
A clear restriction to ASCII is bet
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:18:18PM +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 08:01:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Respectively from Latin Extended-B and Latin Extended-A. As I said,
> > there is no official policy on it, to the letter of the policy any
> > non-ASCII is
29 matches
Mail list logo
