also sprach Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.16.2359 +0200]:
> Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> and I failed miserably. :-) I'll just forget about debmake's existance
> from n
Dear Debian mentors
I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs
#233606 and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the
packages containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the
binaries have been removed since and the bugs closed.
However, this mean
Hi there,
I'm seeking a new sponsor for laptop-mode-tools. My previous sponsor has
decided to reduce his workload, so I'm currently sponsorless. The amount
of work required is small, there's one or two uploads every month.
--
Bart Samwel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vanwege vakantie ben ik afwezig van 4-15 oktober.
Voor dringende zaken m.b.t. studieadvies/examencommissie kunt u contact opnemen
met de opleidingsdirecteur dhr. Van Lieshout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Afspraken m.b.t. studieadvies via het secretariaat 053-4894320.
Voor dringende zaken m.b.t. stages/B-o
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:45:34AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.16.2359 +0200]:
> > Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> > the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> > and I
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2031 +0200]:
> That isn't an accurate description of debmake, as should be clear
> from its package description. The debmake package contains debstd,
> which is a monolithic program occupying roughly the same space as
> debhelper, and deb-mak
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 09:35:32PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2031 +0200]:
> > That isn't an accurate description of debmake, as should be clear
> > from its package description. The debmake package contains debstd,
> > which is a monoli
#include
* martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 11:45:34AM]:
> And about dh-make... stop using it anyway. Either switch to using
> cdbs, or get a hang of packaging so that you don't have to call this
I disagree. cdbs sucks when it comes to some "advanced" extensions that
its creators did not think
also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2004 +0200]:
> Do you really think that deleting dh_ calls (instead of commenting them)
> is wise?
Did I say delete dh_* calls? I said to delete *.ex files.
Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to li
* Andree Leidenfrost [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:33:28 +1000]:
> I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs
> #233606 and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the
> packages containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the
> binaries have been removed si
* Eduard Bloch [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:04:21 +0200]:
> Do you really think that deleting dh_ calls (instead of commenting them)
> is wise?
then a huge flame may be in place, since it's what is always recommended
here in d-mentors: "remove commented and unused calls to dh_*".
--
Adeodato Simó
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Gaim-encryption is a plugin for gaim that provides strong end-to-end
encryption.
http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net/
The package is lintian/linda clean.
Please find the source packages at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m
begin quotation of Chris Vanden Berghe on 2004-10-18 00:45:58 +0200:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Does you package differ substantially from Leo Costela's? [1] I
believe he was waiting to have a gaim-dev package before uploading it
to the archvie. In any case, y
I demand that Andree Leidenfrost may or may not have written...
> I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs #233606
> and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the packages
> containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the binaries
> have been re
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 11:59:50PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> and I failed miserably. :-) I'll just forget about debmake's existance
> from now on th
also sprach Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.16.2359 +0200]:
> Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> and I failed miserably. :-) I'll just forget about debmake's existance
> from n
Dear Debian mentors
I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs
#233606 and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the
packages containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the
binaries have been removed since and the bugs closed.
However, this mean
Hi there,
I'm seeking a new sponsor for laptop-mode-tools. My previous sponsor has
decided to reduce his workload, so I'm currently sponsorless. The amount
of work required is small, there's one or two uploads every month.
--
Bart Samwel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Vanwege vakantie ben ik afwezig van 4-15 oktober.
Voor dringende zaken m.b.t. studieadvies/examencommissie kunt u contact opnemen met de
opleidingsdirecteur dhr. Van Lieshout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Afspraken m.b.t. studieadvies via het secretariaat 053-4894320.
Voor dringende zaken m.b.t. stages/B-o
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:45:34AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.16.2359 +0200]:
> > Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> > the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> > and I
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2031 +0200]:
> That isn't an accurate description of debmake, as should be clear
> from its package description. The debmake package contains debstd,
> which is a monolithic program occupying roughly the same space as
> debhelper, and deb-mak
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 09:35:32PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2031 +0200]:
> > That isn't an accurate description of debmake, as should be clear
> > from its package description. The debmake package contains debstd,
> > which is a monoli
#include
* martin f krafft [Sun, Oct 17 2004, 11:45:34AM]:
> And about dh-make... stop using it anyway. Either switch to using
> cdbs, or get a hang of packaging so that you don't have to call this
I disagree. cdbs sucks when it comes to some "advanced" extensions that
its creators did not think
also sprach Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.2004 +0200]:
> Do you really think that deleting dh_ calls (instead of commenting them)
> is wise?
Did I say delete dh_* calls? I said to delete *.ex files.
Apart, yes, why not delete dh_* calls?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to li
* Andree Leidenfrost [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:33:28 +1000]:
> I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs
> #233606 and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the
> packages containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the
> binaries have been removed si
* Eduard Bloch [Sun, 17 Oct 2004 20:04:21 +0200]:
> Do you really think that deleting dh_ calls (instead of commenting them)
> is wise?
then a huge flame may be in place, since it's what is always recommended
here in d-mentors: "remove commented and unused calls to dh_*".
--
Adeodato Simó
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Gaim-encryption is a plugin for gaim that provides strong end-to-end
encryption.
http://gaim-encryption.sourceforge.net/
The package is lintian/linda clean.
Please find the source packages at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/m
begin quotation of Chris Vanden Berghe on 2004-10-18 00:45:58 +0200:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my gaim-encryption package.
Does you package differ substantially from Leo Costela's? [1] I
believe he was waiting to have a gaim-dev package before uploading it
to the archvie. In any case, y
I demand that Andree Leidenfrost may or may not have written...
> I am the co-maintainer for packages mindi and mondo which had bugs #233606
> and #233605 filed a while ago. These bugs where about the packages
> containing binaries in the upstream source. This was true, the binaries
> have been re
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 11:59:50PM +0200, Magnus Therning wrote:
> Ah, cool. I am not sure why, but for some reason I thought dh-make was
> the deprecated one. I just made an attempt at packaging a python lib,
> and I failed miserably. :-) I'll just forget about debmake's existance
> from now on th
we care about your health
Feel the Energy and Recapture your youth
For many, this is a powerful second chance
go here to read how this can change your life
http://ivls.iK.benefitproductshall.com/i/
Restoring my former levels of fitness and energy with this product. Also
have noted that my hair
Hello.
I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc.
Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond
for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time.
Here goes relevant information:
Package name: asc - turn-based strategy game
Advanced Strate
32 matches
Mail list logo
