Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread tripping
I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including one, similar to the system-imager package, wh

subscribe

2004-07-24 Thread aryix
pub 1024D/DA025B59 2002-10-29 Aryix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 179D F460 E8E2 D6A6 1E3D 1D05 B152 24AE DA02 5B59 sub 1024g/DFD63464 2002-10-29

apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: >> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if I run apt-get it installs

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread Frank Küster
tripping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a > base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell > scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It > excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind includin

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think > apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. > Here there is an example, gallery depends on: > >> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... > On my mac

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the list... Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto: > Is this any different from bug 122304? > Nick Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same... But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch wh

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: > But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install > apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common > and apache-utils... !!! > > # apt-get install apache2 gallery > [ .. snip .. ] > The follo

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking > about something like this: > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1] h

RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-24 Thread Nick Lewycky
Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (install package) WNPP bug : http://bugs.debian.org/261257 Long description: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] performs research by simul

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch > which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers. If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions include: - Applying the

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: > > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking > > about something like this: > > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | >

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html > > > A package depends on "apache | apache

RFS for python-gd, RTA by its maintainer

2004-07-24 Thread Iustin Pop
Hello to all, The python-gd package has been RFA'ed by its maintainer, Ben Pfaff. I spoke with him about me taking over and he agreed, as long as I find a sponsor (he doesn't have time). Now, I changed the RFA bug (#223755) to ITA, I prepared a new version of the package, solving the one (wishlis

Wow, I Really Need This! cD3

2004-07-24 Thread Celina Hansen
User ID: 4 drunk Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:15:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--87873530057614470287" 87873530057614470287 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Debian-laptop-request Why pay more when you can enjoy the be

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 07:37:58PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > tripping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a > > base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell > > scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/ma

Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread tripping
I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind including one, similar to the system-imager package, wh

subscribe

2004-07-24 Thread aryix
pub 1024D/DA025B59 2002-10-29 Aryix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key fingerprint = 179D F460 E8E2 D6A6 1E3D 1D05 B152 24AE DA02 5B59 sub 1024g/DFD63464 2002-10-29 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. Here there is an example, gallery depends on: >> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... On my machine I haven't installed any of them, so if I run apt-get it installs

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread Frank Küster
tripping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a > base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell > scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/maintainer. It > excpects a kernel to be there, and I don't mind includin

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2004-07-24 Fabio Tranchitella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, maybe I'm missing something (so please don't flog me :)) but I think > apt doesn't handle properly the Depends field. > Here there is an example, gallery depends on: > >> Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl, ... > On my mac

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
You have replied in private, I hope you won't mind if I answer on the list... Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 19:36, Nick Lewycky ha scritto: > Is this any different from bug 122304? > Nick Yep, you are right, I think the bug is the same... But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch wh

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Fabio Tranchitella
Il sab, 2004-07-24 alle 20:03, Fabio Tranchitella ha scritto: > But if I change the order of the packages apt doesn't try to install > apache (and this is right, of course) but try to install apache-common > and apache-utils... !!! > > # apt-get install apache2 gallery > [ .. snip .. ] > The follo

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking > about something like this: > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. [1] h

RFS: Folding@home

2004-07-24 Thread Nick Lewycky
Package name : folding Version : 4.00 Upstream : http://folding.stanford.edu URL : http://wagon.dhs.org/folding/ Description : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Client (install package) WNPP bug : http://bugs.debian.org/261257 Long description: "[EMAIL PROTECTED] performs research by simulat

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > But why nobody has yet taken care about it? There is a patch > which (maybe) fix the bug without any answer from the maintainers. If you are interested in seeing this (minor) bug fixed, helpful actions include: - Applying the

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Fabio Tranchitella [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:08:23 +0200]: > > Is it possible to specify related alternative dependency? I'm thinking > > about something like this: > > Depends: [apache, php4] | [apache2, libapache2-mod-php4] | >

Re: apt doesn't handle properly the depends field or I'm missing something?

2004-07-24 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Steve Langasek [Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:29:16 -0700]: > On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:18:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > there was a thread [1] about this in debian-devel last month. > > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg00133.html > > > A package depends on "apache | apache

RFS for python-gd, RTA by its maintainer

2004-07-24 Thread Iustin Pop
Hello to all, The python-gd package has been RFA'ed by its maintainer, Ben Pfaff. I spoke with him about me taking over and he agreed, as long as I find a sponsor (he doesn't have time). Now, I changed the RFA bug (#223755) to ITA, I prepared a new version of the package, solving the one (wishlis

Wow, I Really Need This! cD3

2004-07-24 Thread Celina Hansen
User ID: 4 drunk Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 17:15:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--87873530057614470287" 87873530057614470287 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Debian-laptop-request Why pay more when you can enjoy the be

Re: Some advice for a non-binary package

2004-07-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 07:37:58PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > tripping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > I have a project that I think would be useful, it uses debian as a > > base. It doesn't contain any binary code, only python and shell > > scripts. It's an easy to use cluster installer/ma