On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > pkg-config is a *far* worse offender than libtool. With libtool, we
> > have some hope of getting these things right in the near future;
> > pkg-config, OTOH, doesn't even know there *is* a difference between
> > static and s
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 22:15, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging
> > > offense.
>
> > Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... though not until some of
> > the mo
* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I used a statically-linked binary just a few days ago. I needed to
> resize an NTFS partition on a newly-delivered system which came with
> Windows XP. In the event, I was able to get a statically linked
> binary, copy it onto a floppy and run this after
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging
> > offense.
>
> Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... though not until some of
> the more exotic ports come to fruition.
>
> "Debian Solaris" anyone? :o)
I'm not 100%
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
> build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
> them. We could provide some mechanism to automatically strip
> binaries, surely?
I believe that
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:59:34PM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>> > pkg-config is a *far* worse offender than libtool. With libtool, we
>> > have some hope of getting these things right in the near future;
>> > pkg-config, OTOH, doesn't even know
* Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> If you are creating a library package, you should ship the shared
> library (and SONAME symlink) in the libxxxN package and the static
> library, name-only symlink *AND* .la file (if relevant) in the
> libxxx[N]-dev package.
Right, on Debian shipp
On Sunday 07 March 2004 9:59 pm, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the mimms package. This upload would
> close ITP bug #221806.
I've gettextized mimms, so now have a new version available that has
i18n support for all of it's messages.
> Source and binary pa
On 2004-03-22 Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 04:26:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> [libtool brokenness]
> >> Yes, it did :-|. Could you point me to a documentation where I could
> >> read about these problems, and
Alexander Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 20:54 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>> On a related note, I'd also be very happy if it was a requirement to
>> build libraries with a miniumum of "-g -ggdb -gdwarf-2", and not strip
>> them. We could provide some mechanism to aut
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I used a statically-linked binary just a few days ago. I needed to
>> resize an NTFS partition on a newly-delivered system which came with
>> Windows XP. In the event, I was able to get a statically linked
>>
Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Scott James Remnant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > But shipping .la files in non-dev packages should still be a hanging
>> > offense.
>>
>> Plugins using libltdl probably need them ... though not until some of
>> the more exotic ports come to fruition
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:26:39PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>I used a statically-linked binary just a few days ago. I needed to
>>resize an NTFS partition on a newly-delivered system which came with
>>Windows XP. In the event, I was able to get a stat
* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not 100% sure but I actually thought that's what OpenLDAP used
> > (libltdl) and it works just fine w/o the stupid .la files.
>
> Have you actually *used* libltdl yourself? For several reasons, it's
> oft
* Bernhard R. Link ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040322 21:14]:
> > Pffft. Honestly, I think that claim of end-users and local
> > administrators using static libraries is rather dated and rarely the
> > case these days.
>
> I do not know, if they are used to
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:26:39PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >Boot Knoppix or similar from a CD. PCs today are more often installed
> >with CDs than floppies anyway. That's really a pretty poor reason.
>
> I cannot use a Knoppix CD to re
* Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Consider this situation:
Situations can be derived for anything. :)
> > Joe Average installs Debian which *handles* all of the dependencies.
> > Come on, this isn't even a reason to keep them.
>
> What about users who don't run Debian, or who don't run
Hi Mentors,
I have added minimum support for both
PHP and Perl into ruli-0.19. The new
Debian packages are uploaded to
mentors.debian.net and are also
available in the usual place:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
I have a signature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
my gpg key. I suppose that is
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 08:54:17PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> I used a statically-linked binary just a few days ago. I needed to
> resize an NTFS partition on a newly-delivered system which came with
> Windows XP. In the event, I was able to get a statically linked
> binary, copy it onto a flop
I have submitted an ITA (Bug#238972), but the original RFA is
Bug#238972. I have new packages created for relay-ctrl at the current
version per the RFA. I attempted to contact the current maintainer,
but i have received no response after a few days.
What else should I be doing in order to execute
[Bob Proulx]
> There appear to be three cases.
>
> 1. The developer wrote the Makefiles by hand and did not supply any
>support for DESTDIR natively.
Actually there is also:
1a. The developer wrote Makefiles by hand, but also happens to have a
clue, so at some point added DESTDIR su
Forum:
http://mentors.debian.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=35&sid=d33a77afe7960fb079f69e21927abb6f
Also:
http://freshmet.net/projects/pim-tb
http://freshmeat.net/screenshots/45596/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pim-tb
I'm working on the 1.5 version. The package name is "pim" which is somewhat
gene
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 09:19:58PM -0800, Tom Ballard wrote:
>Forum:
>http://mentors.debian.net/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=35&sid=d33a77afe7960fb079f69e21927abb6f
>
>Also:
>http://freshmet.net/projects/pim-tb
>http://freshmeat.net/screenshots/45596/
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/pim-tb
>
>I'm working
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 05:10:29PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Please read [0] if you haven't done so. For one, there is no ITP record
> at [1].
>
> [0] http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wnpp
Okay, did that
101 - 124 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
