Hi.
I'd be very grateful for a sponsor for my package of the cnet network
simulator. The package (compiled for sarge) is at
http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~ncj/cnet.html
Best regards.
Nick Jamieson
Hello,
one question:
What will be the _right_ method for sec updates.
refering to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200309/msg01509.html
and refering special to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200309/msg01537.html
1. choice
everytime where a new b
fvwm-themes the 6.
http://smilebef.homelinux.org/~smilebef
here are the files.
I think fvwm-themes are ready.
For Sponsors without concept of native packages, this is a native
package.(i fell nobody will answer to me, ok my english also is bad)
Also i have access to the cvs.
This request is for co
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:39:54AM +0200, Daniel J. Priem wrote:
> 1. choice
>
> everytime where a new busybox | xserver_something | another package
> due to security reasons is released
> LTSP also needs and gets an secupdate
>
> 2. choice
>
> or having something like
>
> build_rootfs.sh re
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 05:56, Nick Jamieson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd be very grateful for a sponsor for my package of the cnet network
> simulator. The package (compiled for sarge) is at
> http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~ncj/cnet.html
You should always check your packages compile against unstable rather
t
Hi all,
In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
the following to happen to these bianry packages:
`emacs-goodies-extra-el'
-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
`debbugs-el'
-> replaced by `debian-el'
I did the following in the control
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I created a Packages.gz file to test the upgrade to these and added an
> entry to it to sources.list. Here's what happens:
>
> # apt-get -u dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... D
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbugs-el'
>-> replaced b
Quoting Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the ordinary tools to upgrade the system are not enough to upgrade
> the system and the release notes are longer than that, I think it's a
> clear sign that we have made something wrong.
I think versioned provides would be a way to fix this by avoid
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbug
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, the fact that APT tries to not remove any of your currently
> installed packages during an upgrade.
kay, I was under the false impression this worked.
> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> something you can d
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
> > emacs-goodies-extra-el a dummy (empty) package which
Hello,
Is there some resource that lets me find "overlooked" bugs-- for
example, RC bugs older than 2 weeks and having no follow-up messages?
If not, what is the best way to generate such a list on my own?
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if le.o /
Hello,
one question:
What will be the _right_ method for sec updates.
refering to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200309/msg01509.html
and refering special to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200309/msg01537.html
1. choice
everytime where a new b
fvwm-themes the 6.
http://smilebef.homelinux.org/~smilebef
here are the files.
I think fvwm-themes are ready.
For Sponsors without concept of native packages, this is a native
package.(i fell nobody will answer to me, ok my english also is bad)
Also i have access to the cvs.
This request is for co
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:39:54AM +0200, Daniel J. Priem wrote:
> 1. choice
>
> everytime where a new busybox | xserver_something | another package
> due to security reasons is released
> LTSP also needs and gets an secupdate
>
> 2. choice
>
> or having something like
>
> build_rootfs.sh re
On Fri, 2003-10-03 at 05:56, Nick Jamieson wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'd be very grateful for a sponsor for my package of the cnet network
> simulator. The package (compiled for sarge) is at
> http://www.mcs.vuw.ac.nz/~ncj/cnet.html
You should always check your packages compile against unstable rather
t
Hi all,
In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
the following to happen to these bianry packages:
`emacs-goodies-extra-el'
-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
`debbugs-el'
-> replaced by `debian-el'
I did the following in the control
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I created a Packages.gz file to test the upgrade to these and added an
> entry to it to sources.list. Here's what happens:
>
> # apt-get -u dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... D
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbugs-el'
>-> replaced b
Quoting Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the ordinary tools to upgrade the system are not enough to upgrade
> the system and the release notes are longer than that, I think it's a
> clear sign that we have made something wrong.
I think versioned provides would be a way to fix this by avoid
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbug
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, the fact that APT tries to not remove any of your currently
> installed packages during an upgrade.
kay, I was under the false impression this worked.
> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> something you can d
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
> > emacs-goodies-extra-el a dummy (empty) package which
Hello,
Is there some resource that lets me find "overlooked" bugs-- for
example, RC bugs older than 2 weeks and having no follow-up messages?
If not, what is the best way to generate such a list on my own?
Thanks,
-John
--
http:// if le.o /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
25 matches
Mail list logo
