[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the tree structure of your repository look like (where are the
packages , where is Packages.gz etc ) and where do you point to in
/etc/apt/sources.list ?
The directory structure of my archive looks like this:
~/archive/binary$ ls
Packages.gz spinelli
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:13:11AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The Packages.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive packages . > /dev/null | gzip > Packages.gz
>
> The Sources.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive sources . > /dev/
Hello,
I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
created (the ITP is bug #206290).
Info about the package:
* Package name: ispell-lt [*]
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Albertas Agejevas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sraige.mif.vu.lt/cvs/
I'm renaming the libtext-csv-perl module to libtext-csv-xs-perl (it
provides Text::CSV_XS not Text::CSV).
It is lintian clean, however linda complains that an arch specific file
end up in /usr/share/perl5
If I have it in /usr/lib/perl5 lintian complains...
What's the correct thing to do here? th
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
binary), or use
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
or such
--
- mdz
I tried using
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
&
moving the
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > >
> > > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
> >
> > These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
> > binary), or use
> >
> > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
> >
>
Geert Stappers wrote:
I missed the architecture in your archive directory lay-out.
Architecture is something like 'alpha', 'powerpc'. or 'ia64'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ pwd
/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ ls
binary-alpha bi
Eric Winger wrote:
I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
not correct?
Eric: This is really very simple. 'apt-get' is just a web browser.
Look at other repositories. Look at your sources.list an
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 22:03]:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
> not correct?
Well, at least I have lost the overview over this thread. I myself use
this script (courtesy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 August 2003 20:50, Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is
> that not correct?
I use the following:
* Pu
Christopher Curtis wrote:
Eric: This is really very simple.
I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
I can't install
Hi,
K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> created (the ITP is bug #206290).
[ snip ]
I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- D
Pn, 2003-08-22 23:58, Rene Engelhard rašė:
> Hi,
>
> K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> > I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> > created (the ITP is bug #206290).
>
> [ snip ]
>
> I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
> Beware, I wrote the myspell pol
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the sitemap package, but I'm no DD. I've got an
update (2.3-5) which is linda- and lintian clean. It is available at
[0]. Could somebody upload it, please? Thank you very much.
[0] http://www.isotton.com/debian/sitemap/
Greetings,
Aaron
--
http://www.isotton.
On 08/22/03 17:00, Eric Winger wrote:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
Ok - firstly I want to clarify my previous post, regarding
documentation, which could be easily misconstrued.
W
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does the tree structure of your repository look like (where are the
packages , where is Packages.gz etc ) and where do you point to in
/etc/apt/sources.list ?
The directory structure of my archive looks like this:
~/archive/binary$ ls
Packages.gz spinelli_0.9
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 09:13:11AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> The Packages.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive packages . > /dev/null | gzip > Packages.gz
>
> The Sources.gz was created with: (from inside ~/archive/binary)
>
> apt-ftparchive sources . > /dev/
Hello,
I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
created (the ITP is bug #206290).
Info about the package:
* Package name: ispell-lt [*]
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Albertas Agejevas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sraige.mif.vu.lt/cvs/
I'm renaming the libtext-csv-perl module to libtext-csv-xs-perl (it
provides Text::CSV_XS not Text::CSV).
It is lintian clean, however linda complains that an arch specific file
end up in /usr/share/perl5
If I have it in /usr/lib/perl5 lintian complains...
What's the correct thing to do here? th
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
binary), or use
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
or such
--
- mdz
I tried using
deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
&
moving the conten
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Eric Winger wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > >
> > > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive binary/
> >
> > These are incompatible. Either create Packages relative to archive (not
> > binary), or use
> >
> > deb file:///home/ewinger/archive/binary ./
> >
>
Geert Stappers wrote:
I missed the architecture in your archive directory lay-out.
Architecture is something like 'alpha', 'powerpc'. or 'ia64'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ pwd
/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/pub/debian/dists/sarge/main
$ ls
binary-alpha binary
Eric Winger wrote:
I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
not correct?
Eric: This is really very simple. 'apt-get' is just a web browser.
Look at other repositories. Look at your sources.list and t
* Eric Winger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030822 22:03]:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is that
> not correct?
Well, at least I have lost the overview over this thread. I myself use
this script (courtesy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 22 August 2003 20:50, Eric Winger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still missing something. Where should the .deb files be in
> relationship to the Packages.gz? I thought the same directory. Is
> that not correct?
I use the following:
* Pu
Christopher Curtis wrote:
Eric: This is really very simple.
I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
implemented what you talked about. The problem is that for some reason,
I can't install t
Hi,
K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> created (the ITP is bug #206290).
[ snip ]
I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
Beware, I wrote the myspell policy... :)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- D
Pn, 2003-08-22 23:58, Rene Engelhard rašė:
> Hi,
>
> K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> > I'm hoping to find a sponsor for the ispell-lt package that I've
> > created (the ITP is bug #206290).
>
> [ snip ]
>
> I'll check them, upload them or pester you with corrections.
> Beware, I wrote the myspell pol
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of the sitemap package, but I'm no DD. I've got an
update (2.3-5) which is linda- and lintian clean. It is available at
[0]. Could somebody upload it, please? Thank you very much.
[0] http://www.isotton.com/debian/sitemap/
Greetings,
Aaron
--
http://www.isotton.
On 08/22/03 17:00, Eric Winger wrote:
> I think part of the problem, is that the original problem got lost. I'll
> snip your comments, because I believe I understand and correctly have
Ok - firstly I want to clarify my previous post, regarding
documentation, which could be easily misconstrued.
W
30 matches
Mail list logo
