On 20030326T175919-0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Imho, debian-email should be publicly accessible and a bug should be
> filed against lists.debian.org, but then I wonder if there's some
> "private" email going to debian-email that shouldn't go to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because most people on debi
Hi all,
I am about to make a new package of netenv. First, I just incorporated
the new upstream version, and the package I build passed the lintian
test. However, the postinst script in netenv-0.82 asked
questions. Therefore I debconf'ized the package. I did some more minor
changes, but I am not a
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Now lintian complains:
> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
> put into postinst and prerm.
The usr/doc transition is considered comple
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 07:43:53PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Now lintian complains:
>
> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>
> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
> put into postinst and prerm.
>
> D
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Now lintian complains:
>> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
>> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
>> put into postins
Can someone please take me off of this list
I have tried many times. All requests
are returned with a message saying it did
not work.
I am possibly here under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the love of God. Someone, please help.
On Thu, 27 M
Hi.
Frank Küster wrote:
> So if I intend to prepare official packages, what should I do? Probably
> I first should install debian-policy & Co. from unstable and make sure
> that I always have the current version at hand. But what about software
> involved in packaging, like dpkg-dev, devscripts, d
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:26:30 +, Frank K|ster wrote:
> So if I intend to prepare official packages, what should I do? Probably
> I first should install debian-policy & Co. from unstable and make sure
> that I always have the current version at hand. But what about software
> involved in pa
so when i write to a third party about debian, i CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
To quote from /usr/share/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt
(apt-get install doc-debian):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : A generic "grab-bag" list for Debian related
correspondence such as contacting upstream authors
also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
suffice.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> To quote from /usr/share/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt
> (apt-get install doc-debian):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Description : A generic "grab-bag" list for Debian related
> correspondence such as contacting
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
> suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet, so all I can rely on is the
documentat
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >^^^ ^^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
> /etc/aliases on master.
Well, now
debian-mentors:您好!
We are QINGFENG GROUP CO.
We manufacture & export:Urea Formaldehyde Molding Compound (Type: Injection &
Compression;
Granular & Powder; Comply to the standard of GB 13454-92, JIS K6911 and UL-94);
Melamine Molding Powder; Glazing Powder (Over-Lay Resin);
Why can't these spammers just die! Or better yet go serve as human shields for
Sadaam?
Quoting QG group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again mentors!
It's been over two weeks since my last RFS, so I figured I'd try
again...
I have adopted the moon-lander package from an MIA DD, and packaged the
new upstream version. Latest changelog entries are:
moon-lander (1:1.0-2) unstabl
On 20030326T175919-0600, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Imho, debian-email should be publicly accessible and a bug should be
> filed against lists.debian.org, but then I wonder if there's some
> "private" email going to debian-email that shouldn't go to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because most people on debi
Hi all,
I am about to make a new package of netenv. First, I just incorporated
the new upstream version, and the package I build passed the lintian
test. However, the postinst script in netenv-0.82 asked
questions. Therefore I debconf'ized the package. I did some more minor
changes, but I am not a
Hi Frank,
Frank Küster wrote:
> Now lintian complains:
> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
> put into postinst and prerm.
The usr/doc transition is considered comple
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 07:43:53PM +0100, Frank K?ster wrote:
> Now lintian complains:
>
> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>
> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
> put into postinst and prerm.
>
> D
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hi Frank,
>
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Now lintian complains:
>> W: netenv: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
>> W: netenv: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>> Formerly, the respective links where set by parts that dh_installdocs
>> put into postins
Can someone please take me off of this list
I have tried many times. All requests
are returned with a message saying it did
not work.
I am possibly here under
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For the love of God. Someone, please help.
On Thu, 27 M
Hi.
Frank Küster wrote:
> So if I intend to prepare official packages, what should I do? Probably
> I first should install debian-policy & Co. from unstable and make sure
> that I always have the current version at hand. But what about software
> involved in packaging, like dpkg-dev, devscripts, d
Hi,
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:26:30 +, Frank K|ster wrote:
> So if I intend to prepare official packages, what should I do? Probably
> I first should install debian-policy & Co. from unstable and make sure
> that I always have the current version at hand. But what about software
> involved in pa
so when i write to a third party about debian, i CC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin,
To quote from /usr/share/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt
(apt-get install doc-debian):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description : A generic "grab-bag" list for Debian related
correspondence such as contacting upstream authors
also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
suffice.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> To quote from /usr/share/doc/debian/mailing-lists.txt
> (apt-get install doc-debian):
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Description : A generic "grab-bag" list for Debian related
> correspondence such as contacting
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joe Nahmias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.27.2151 +0100]:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> looking at the mails in the archive, [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to
> suffice.
If you say so. I'm not a DD yet, so all I can rely on is the
documentat
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > So you would cc such emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >^^^ ^^
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for that. Those with accounts can see
> /etc/aliases on master.
Well, now
debian-mentors:您好!
We are QINGFENG GROUP CO.
We manufacture & export:Urea Formaldehyde Molding Compound (Type: Injection
& Compression;
Granular & Powder; Comply to the standard of GB 13454-92, JIS K6911 and
UL-94);
Melamine Molding Powder; Glazing Powder (Over-Lay Resin);
Why can't these spammers just die! Or better yet go serve as human shields for
Sadaam?
Quoting QG group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
33 matches
Mail list logo
