On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
> compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
> sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
> apt/dpkg a
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:14:25PM +0100, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
> > compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
> > sendmai
hello list,
there is a bug reported (Bug#178971) against one of my packages which
only seems to occur on m68k. since i want to test my package before the
next release, i thought about doing test-runs on crest.d.o. the website
at db.d.o/machines.cgi says that this machine is accessble by "all".
so
Hello, ...
I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
that :
$ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
And effectively, if i open the .deb, i see that /etc/ocaml/ld.conf is
listed two times as conffile.
N
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
> I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> that :
>
> $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
>
> And effectively, if i open the .deb, i see tha
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> > E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplica
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:31:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> that :
>
> $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
>
> And effectively, i
Hello Sven,
Sven Luther wrote:
> I am using debhelper, and i guess one of the debhelpers is responsible
> for this. Does anyone have an idea of where this is coming from ?
man debhelper says that for compat mode >= 3:
Every file in etc/ is automatically flagged as a conffile by dh_installdeb.
Chee
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello, ...
I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
that :
$ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
And effectively, if i open the .deb, i
David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Debhelp automaticaly adds every /etc file to conffile.
>>So, remove this entry from ocaml-base-3.06-1.conffiles.
>>
> I've been getting this error too. I just have a conffiles file in my
> debian directory. It contains one /etc/ line. But if I
> remove
Hello,
It is me again, ...
While trying to build my package on sparc, i get :
dpkg-deb: failed to open package info file
`debian/ocaml-native-compilers-3.06-1/DEBIAN/control' for reading: No such file or
directory
which has me trully baffled.
The package builds fine on i386, and two other b
There is a biology/bio-informatics package which I would like to add to
debian. I have easily installed this package under woody and would like to
know what steps I should take to turn this piece of software into a deb.
My first question is "Am I writing to the correct list?". If I am not writi
Hi,
if I want to get into software development for Debian: Is it recommended to
stay with stable or upgrade to sid?
Regards,
Volker Sturm
--
Volker Sturm
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++
Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Kevin J. Kalupson wrote:
There is a biology/bio-informatics package which I would like to add to
debian. I have easily installed this package under woody and would like to
know what steps I should take to turn this piece of software into a deb.
My first question is "Am I writing to the correct
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
> compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
> sendmail/postfix (the uspported MTA's) but not have it registered with
> apt/dpkg a
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:14:25PM +0100, Martin Baehr wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:37:25PM -0800, John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> > to throw even more monkeywrenches in the gearbox, some people may have
> > compiled an MTA outside of the packaging system, and be using qmail/
> > sendmai
hello list,
there is a bug reported (Bug#178971) against one of my packages which
only seems to occur on m68k. since i want to test my package before the
next release, i thought about doing test-runs on crest.d.o. the website
at db.d.o/machines.cgi says that this machine is accessble by "all".
so
Hello, ...
I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
that :
$ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
And effectively, if i open the .deb, i see that /etc/ocaml/ld.conf is
listed two times as conffile.
N
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
>
> I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> that :
>
> $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
>
> And effectively, if i open the .deb, i see tha
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:58:11PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
> >
> > I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> > that :
> >
> > $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> > E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplica
Hi!
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:31:10PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> Hello, ...
>
> I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
> that :
>
> $ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
> E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
>
> And effectively, i
Hello Sven,
Sven Luther wrote:
> I am using debhelper, and i guess one of the debhelpers is responsible
> for this. Does anyone have an idea of where this is coming from ?
man debhelper says that for compat mode >= 3:
Every file in etc/ is automatically flagged as a conffile by dh_installdeb.
Chee
Jérôme Marant wrote:
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello, ...
I am preparing a new version of one of my packages, and lintian claims
that :
$ lintian ocaml-base-3.06-1_3.06-16_i386.deb
E: ocaml-base-3.06-1: duplicate-conffile /etc/ocaml/ld.conf
And effectively, if i open the .d
David Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>Debhelp automaticaly adds every /etc file to conffile.
>>So, remove this entry from ocaml-base-3.06-1.conffiles.
>>
> I've been getting this error too. I just have a conffiles file in my
> debian directory. It contains one /etc/ line. But if I
> remove
Hello,
It is me again, ...
While trying to build my package on sparc, i get :
dpkg-deb: failed to open package info file
`debian/ocaml-native-compilers-3.06-1/DEBIAN/control' for reading: No such file
or directory
which has me trully baffled.
The package builds fine on i386, and two other b
25 matches
Mail list logo
