Hi,
I have created my first Debian package of vimoutliner (see
http://www.troubleshooters.com/projects/vimoutliner/ for the
upstream homepage). There are no problems with lintian, but could
anybody take a look at it and help me to get it to the main
distribution, please?
It is available at http:
Hello,
I'd like to adopt qiv (bug #176329), but I am not a DD yet.
I am using this package and don't want to see it removed. Should I file
ITA?
Or maybe - how long should I wait for some real DD to take care of this
package before filing ITA myself?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
"Who are we helping? - t
hello dariush...
Received at 2003-01-14 / 22:24 by Dariush Pietrzak:
> I'd like to adopt qiv (bug #176329), but I am not a DD yet.
> I am using this package and don't want to see it removed. Should I file
> ITA?
> Or maybe - how long should I wait for some real DD to take care of this
> package
For the record, I got in touch with James Troup, who told me I could
either meet another Debian developer to sign a new key of mine, or I
could start over with the NM process.
--LG
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I would like to adopt the 'autolog' package which has recently become
orphaned. I am not a DD yet (going through NM process) and neither my AM
or advocate has much time to help me.
Would anyone be kind enough to check my package and tell me if it looks
OK? (and possibly upload). I
> Those libs are binary-only run-time libs if I understand correctly.
> Did you evaluate the impact of those C++ libs in respect with gcc 3.2
> migration path in sid? They are compiled against old ABI, I think. And the
> same for all Kylix stuff.
Hi,
you understand this correctly, these package
hallo!
ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux
projekts. wir würden gerne mit unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian
mirrors vertreten sein.
ich bin 22 jahre alt, wohne in lüneburg und bin
beruflich anwendungsentwickler.
die homepage unseres projekt`s ist:
http://selflinux.source
also sprach Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.01.14.1914 +0100]:
> I have created my first Debian package of vimoutliner (see
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/projects/vimoutliner/ for the
> upstream homepage). There are no problems with lintian, but could
> anybody take a look at it and help me
martin f krafft wrote:
> is not in gzip format. i can't read it. please put a corrected version
> there, then i'll sponsor you.
I do not understand it -- I have just downloaded it and it was
OK. Well, I have recreated .diff file and moreover it is
attached.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED
I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
requiring the user to install the compiler.
My main question is how to name these packages appropria
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 08:06:31PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote:
> I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
> sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
> facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
> requiring the user to inst
Hi,
I have created my first Debian package of vimoutliner (see
http://www.troubleshooters.com/projects/vimoutliner/ for the
upstream homepage). There are no problems with lintian, but could
anybody take a look at it and help me to get it to the main
distribution, please?
It is available at http:
Hello,
I'd like to adopt qiv (bug #176329), but I am not a DD yet.
I am using this package and don't want to see it removed. Should I file
ITA?
Or maybe - how long should I wait for some real DD to take care of this
package before filing ITA myself?
--
Dariush Pietrzak,
"Who are we helping? - t
hello dariush...
Received at 2003-01-14 / 22:24 by Dariush Pietrzak:
> I'd like to adopt qiv (bug #176329), but I am not a DD yet.
> I am using this package and don't want to see it removed. Should I file
> ITA?
> Or maybe - how long should I wait for some real DD to take care of this
> package
For the record, I got in touch with James Troup, who told me I could
either meet another Debian developer to sign a new key of mine, or I
could start over with the NM process.
--LG
Hi all,
I would like to adopt the 'autolog' package which has recently become
orphaned. I am not a DD yet (going through NM process) and neither my AM
or advocate has much time to help me.
Would anyone be kind enough to check my package and tell me if it looks
OK? (and possibly upload). I
> Those libs are binary-only run-time libs if I understand correctly.
> Did you evaluate the impact of those C++ libs in respect with gcc 3.2
> migration path in sid? They are compiled against old ABI, I think. And the
> same for all Kylix stuff.
Hi,
you understand this correctly, these package
hallo!
ich bin einer der maintainer des selflinux
projekts. wir würden gerne mit unserem .deb file auf den offiziellen debian
mirrors vertreten sein.
ich bin 22 jahre alt, wohne in lüneburg und bin
beruflich anwendungsentwickler.
die homepage unseres projekt`s ist:
http://selflinux.source
also sprach Matej Cepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.01.14.1914 +0100]:
> I have created my first Debian package of vimoutliner (see
> http://www.troubleshooters.com/projects/vimoutliner/ for the
> upstream homepage). There are no problems with lintian, but could
> anybody take a look at it and help me
martin f krafft wrote:
> is not in gzip format. i can't read it. please put a corrected version
> there, then i'll sponsor you.
I do not understand it -- I have just downloaded it and it was
OK. Well, I have recreated .diff file and moreover it is
attached.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL PROTECTED
I am working on a repackaging of the SML/NJ package that splits the
sml runtime component apart from the sml compiler. The idea is to
facilitate the packaging of SML programs and libraries without
requiring the user to install the compiler.
My main question is how to name these packages appropria
21 matches
Mail list logo
