Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the build-depends? Regards, Bob -- _ |_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Bob! You wrote: > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > package? The default one for the architecture in question. > If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the > build-depend

Packet writing kernel patch looking for a sponsor

2002-11-05 Thread Luca Pasquali
Package : kernel-patch-packet2.4 Upstream Author : Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Upstream url: http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/patches/packet/ License : GPL Hi, this is a kernel patch for enabling packet writing on cdrw/dvd about which I have already posted recently. I inc

procps

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install and start/stop the daemon. Can anyone advise how I can make proc file system work in the chroot?

Re: procps

2002-11-05 Thread Yven Leist
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 00:34, Bob Hilliard wrote: > I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and > build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc > directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install > and start/stop the daemon. > > Can

Re: procps

2002-11-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and > build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc > directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install > and start/stop the daemon. > > Can anyone advise

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one for the architecture in question. > > > I

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one for the architecture in que

Ynt: margo dnjo

2002-11-05 Thread Marina Bailey
SADECE TÜRK KAÞARLAR VAR!!! DÜNYANIN EN SEKSÝ KIZLARINI CANLI SEYREDÝN! KARÞILIKLI CHAT YAPIN, WEBCAM DE ÝSTEDÝÐÝNÝZ HERÞEYÝ YAPSINLAR! SÝZ ÝSTEYÝN ONLAR SOYUNSUN! TÜRK KIZLARI-TÜRK KAÞARLARI-TÜRK ÜNV. KIZLARI-TÜRK EV KADINLARI VAR! YABANCI HATUN YOK! HEPSÝ SADECE AMA SADECE TÜRK HATUNLARI! VAK

(광고)도화지 닷컴 수채화 교실 !!

2002-11-05 Thread newsletter
Title: 수채화 교실 취미로 그림을 그리고 싶을 뿐. 전문적인 그리기 교육을 받지않은 웹디자이너 님들. 한단계 높은 미술교육을 받고 싶은 초, 중, 고등학생을 위한 교실입니다...

Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any package? If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the build-depends? Regards, Bob -- _ |_) _ |_Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Bob! You wrote: > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > package? The default one for the architecture in question. > If the answer is gcc-3.0, should that be included in the > build-depend

Packet writing kernel patch looking for a sponsor

2002-11-05 Thread Luca Pasquali
Package : kernel-patch-packet2.4 Upstream Author : Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Upstream url: http://w1.894.telia.com/~u89404340/patches/packet/ License : GPL Hi, this is a kernel patch for enabling packet writing on cdrw/dvd about which I have already posted recently. I inc

procps

2002-11-05 Thread Bob Hilliard
I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install and start/stop the daemon. Can anyone advise how I can make proc file system work in the chroot?

Re: procps

2002-11-05 Thread Yven Leist
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 00:34, Bob Hilliard wrote: > I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and > build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc > directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install > and start/stop the daemon. > > Can

Re: procps

2002-11-05 Thread Brian Nelson
Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have built a sid chroot by installing debootstrap and > build-essential. The procps package is installed, but the proc > directory in the chroot is empty. This makes it difficult to install > and start/stop the daemon. > > Can anyone advise

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On Tuesday 05 November 2002 08:03, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one for the architecture in question. > > > I

Re: Which compiler

2002-11-05 Thread Drew Parsons
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi Bob! > > You wrote: > > > For the 1386 architecture, sid has gcc 2:2.95.4-17 and gcc-3.0 > > 1:3.0.4-13. Which compiler should be used for an Architecture: any > > package? > > The default one for the architecture in que