Follows the output of a "lintian -d" on a *.dsc file.
I get the same behaviour on all *.dsc file on which I'm trying,
otherwise I get no problem in using lintian on *.deb packages.
I also straced the lintian process and noticed that the "No such file or
directory" came from a lintian-status file
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> If you agree with me, please send a mail to the bug log so that
> aj can be convinced (just use reply all to this mail). If you don't
> agree, feel free to voice you opinion and justify your position.
I will not cc the bug report,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer of the
> > sponsorship entry. We have the best of
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:40:06PM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> W: libopensc0: package-relation-with-self depends: libopensc0 (>=
> 0.7.0-1isg)
> E: libopensc0: shlib-missing-in-control-file libscam.so
> usr/lib/libscam.so
>
> I'm not sure the root cause of these errors so here's some relevant
>
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:42:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Follows the output of a "lintian -d" on a *.dsc file.
>
> I get the same behaviour on all *.dsc file on which I'm trying,
> otherwise I get no problem in using lintian on *.deb packages.
>
> I also straced the lintian process
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> It could well be. Can you provide the offending packages on an URI where we
> can look at 'em?
Well, sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug anymore.
I've seen this behaviour all this night (elapsed rebuilding about a
dozen of packages)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:42:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > N: /usr/share/lintian/unpack/unpack-srcpkg-l2
>/tmp/lintian-lab.30378/source/netclient
> > internal error: error occured during execution of dpkg-source:
> > int
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:55:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
> IMO a BTS based approach is a nice idea expecially for the availability
> of history (usefull for the AM) and (even if less important) because
> it's more 'official' than the current CGI approach to my eyes.
>
> Anyway pollu
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer of the
> > sponsorship entry. We have the be
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:48:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why is it bad ? It does fullfull our needs ... you recognize it
> yourself. That's enough to start using it.
It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
Anyway, yes, it's enough to start using it, but ..
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the
> > This just means that you never installed a BTS yourself ... :-)
>
> Surely, this is probably my major fault in this discussion ... I was
> supposing that start up a new BTS is an easy task, if this is not the
> case, never mind.
It is not that hard but it is not needed. Virtual packages are
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > >
> > > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS mea
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > Sorry, you're just unconstructive... what overhead
>
> The overhead of managing the bug.
It's not your work, but the sponsoree work. And managing the bug is not
harder for the sponsoree than managing its CGI entry or anythin
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
> It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
It's a smart hack. As is the "ftp.debian.org" or "lists.debian.org"
pseudo-package ...
> This has also a drawback: reconstructing history of threads bet
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > benefits are real and obvious does not really convince me. OTOH you
> > don't need to convince me, I have no special priviliges anyway.
>
> But aj is using people like you to tell me "you have no consensus, I
> won't create what you want" ... sorr
Hi,
Just installed woody, and experimented with Qt 3.0.3
I did this:
g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib -lqt
and also this
g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello -lqt hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib
Compiling process went without error msgs. 'hello' file has been
produced. But this "hell
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:55:45PM +0200, Setyo Nugroho wrote:
> Just installed woody, and experimented with Qt 3.0.3
>
> I did this:
> g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib -lqt
> and also this
> g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello -lqt hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib
>
> Compiling proce
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 10:31, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > But aj is using people like you to tell me "you have no consensus, I
> > won't create what you want" ... sorry, but by beeing unconstructive
> > here, you just block my work.
>
> Sorry, I had the impression you asked for opinions on the subj
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:51:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> You don't proove anything neither ...
You are the person trying to change something, you should prove your
point, instead of worrying about people not proving why this should not
be established.
At least, please try to summarize
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:31:20PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg écrivait:
> You are the person trying to change something, you should prove your
> point, instead of worrying about people not proving why this should not
> be established.
I'm the guy who invented sponsorship, I'm the one who wrote the
sp
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That's why I went away and requested what's necessary :
> http://bugs.debian.org/151949
> Unfortunately, Anthony Towns doesn't agree with me because some IRCers
> misinterpreted the last thread about it.
No, I'm pretty sure ther
In the package cupsys-driver-gimpprint, there are currently 148 PPD
(PostScript Printer Definition) files, about 1.5 MiB in total.
However, the average user will only ever need about one or two of
these (one for each model of printer), so the rest are unused. In
addition, the PPD files can be loc
Hello
I have actively been trying to package the waimea window manager to be
sponsored. There was an error in the 0.3.3 upstream code that has been
fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
branch and put it at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/. However I get
these two lin
Please remember to do a group reply, i.e. keep the Cc: to -mentors.
Nothing private here :)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:02:59AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > W: libopensc0: package-relation-with-self depends: libopensc0 (>=
> > > 0.7.0-1isg)
> > > E: libopensc0: shlib-missing-in-control-file l
On 2002.08.28 03:03 Jay Graves wrote:
> W: waimea: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: waimea: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
> I am really not quite sure what to do here and I would really
> appreciate
> some guidance.
> Thanks
Hi.
As lintian said, you have to write a simple prerm and
Hi Jay,
Jay Graves wrote:
> fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
> branch and put it at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/. However I get
> these two lintian erros.
>
> W: waimea: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: waimea: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
[...]
Hi Giorgio,
Giorgio Mandolfo wrote:
> As lintian said, you have to write a simple prerm and postinst script
> (or add to your previous one) in the debian/ dir, that set the symlink
> to your extra documentation page (and remove it if you remove the
> package).
Not necessary anymore
Regar
On 2002.08.28 03:38 Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Not necessary anymore
I see. That's the reason I sometimes do not see /usr/share/doc symlink
anymore. ;-)
___
If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it
will
serve us right.
-- Alistair Cooke
--
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:03:31PM -0600, Jay Graves wrote:
> Hello
> I have actively been trying to package the waimea window manager to be
> sponsored. There was an error in the 0.3.3 upstream code that has been
> fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
> branch and
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:18, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> Please remember to do a group reply, i.e. keep the Cc: to -mentors.
> Nothing private here :)
oops, didn't realise it. sorry debian-mentors 8)
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:02:59AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > > W: libopensc0: package-rela
Hello. I'm writing to ask if anyone has a few minutes of spare time to
sponsor my packages, and sign me off for advocate status for the debian
project.
The initial packages that I'm presenting are for everything (the engine that
powers Everything2.com, perlmonks.org, animefu.com, etc) and one of
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer of the
> sponsorship entry. We have the best of both world.
We have the overhead of the BTS with no gain (imho) at all.
Follows the output of a "lintian -d" on a *.dsc file.
I get the same behaviour on all *.dsc file on which I'm trying,
otherwise I get no problem in using lintian on *.deb packages.
I also straced the lintian process and noticed that the "No such file or
directory" came from a lintian-status file
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> If you agree with me, please send a mail to the bug log so that
> aj can be convinced (just use reply all to this mail). If you don't
> agree, feel free to voice you opinion and justify your position.
I will not cc the bug report,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer of the
> > sponsorship entry. We have the best of b
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 12:40:06PM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> W: libopensc0: package-relation-with-self depends: libopensc0 (>=
> 0.7.0-1isg)
> E: libopensc0: shlib-missing-in-control-file libscam.so
> usr/lib/libscam.so
>
> I'm not sure the root cause of these errors so here's some relevant
> i
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:42:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Follows the output of a "lintian -d" on a *.dsc file.
>
> I get the same behaviour on all *.dsc file on which I'm trying,
> otherwise I get no problem in using lintian on *.deb packages.
>
> I also straced the lintian process a
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> It could well be. Can you provide the offending packages on an URI where we
> can look at 'em?
Well, sorry, but I can't reproduce the bug anymore.
I've seen this behaviour all this night (elapsed rebuilding about a
dozen of packages)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:55:28AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:42:46AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > N: /usr/share/lintian/unpack/unpack-srcpkg-l2
> > /tmp/lintian-lab.30378/source/netclient
> > internal error: error occured during execution of dpkg-source:
> > i
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:55:45AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
> IMO a BTS based approach is a nice idea expecially for the availability
> of history (usefull for the AM) and (even if less important) because
> it's more 'official' than the current CGI approach to my eyes.
>
> Anyway pollut
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer of the
> > sponsorship entry. We have the bes
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:48:20PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Why is it bad ? It does fullfull our needs ... you recognize it
> yourself. That's enough to start using it.
It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
Anyway, yes, it's enough to start using it, but ...
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the m
> > This just means that you never installed a BTS yourself ... :-)
>
> Surely, this is probably my major fault in this discussion ... I was
> supposing that start up a new BTS is an easy task, if this is not the
> case, never mind.
It is not that hard but it is not needed. Virtual packages are e
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS means mailing debian-mentors
> > > as a side effect since debian-mentors is the maintainer o
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:21:35AM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > > On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > >
> > > > Also, if you realize a bit, mailing the BTS mean
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:12:46PM +0200, Peter Palfrader écrivait:
> > Sorry, you're just unconstructive... what overhead
>
> The overhead of managing the bug.
It's not your work, but the sponsoree work. And managing the bug is not
harder for the sponsoree than managing its CGI entry or anything
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:05:31PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli écrivait:
> It's not bad, is an hack. Fullfill our need but isn't the right place.
It's a smart hack. As is the "ftp.debian.org" or "lists.debian.org"
pseudo-package ...
> This has also a drawback: reconstructing history of threads betw
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > benefits are real and obvious does not really convince me. OTOH you
> > don't need to convince me, I have no special priviliges anyway.
>
> But aj is using people like you to tell me "you have no consensus, I
> won't create what you want" ... sorry
Hi,
Just installed woody, and experimented with Qt 3.0.3
I did this:
g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib -lqt
and also this
g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello -lqt hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib
Compiling process went without error msgs. 'hello' file has been
produced. But this "hello
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:55:45PM +0200, Setyo Nugroho wrote:
> Just installed woody, and experimented with Qt 3.0.3
>
> I did this:
> g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib -lqt
> and also this
> g++ -I$QTDIR/include -o hello -lqt hello.cpp -L$QTDIR/lib
>
> Compiling proces
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 10:31, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > But aj is using people like you to tell me "you have no consensus, I
> > won't create what you want" ... sorry, but by beeing unconstructive
> > here, you just block my work.
>
> Sorry, I had the impression you asked for opinions on the subje
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:51:59PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> You don't proove anything neither ...
You are the person trying to change something, you should prove your
point, instead of worrying about people not proving why this should not
be established.
At least, please try to summarize
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 05:31:20PM +0200, Rune B. Broberg écrivait:
> You are the person trying to change something, you should prove your
> point, instead of worrying about people not proving why this should not
> be established.
I'm the guy who invented sponsorship, I'm the one who wrote the
spo
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 04:40:51PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That's why I went away and requested what's necessary :
> http://bugs.debian.org/151949
> Unfortunately, Anthony Towns doesn't agree with me because some IRCers
> misinterpreted the last thread about it.
No, I'm pretty sure there
In the package cupsys-driver-gimpprint, there are currently 148 PPD
(PostScript Printer Definition) files, about 1.5 MiB in total.
However, the average user will only ever need about one or two of
these (one for each model of printer), so the rest are unused. In
addition, the PPD files can be loca
Hello
I have actively been trying to package the waimea window manager to be
sponsored. There was an error in the 0.3.3 upstream code that has been
fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
branch and put it at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/. However I get
these two lint
Please remember to do a group reply, i.e. keep the Cc: to -mentors.
Nothing private here :)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:02:59AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > W: libopensc0: package-relation-with-self depends: libopensc0 (>=
> > > 0.7.0-1isg)
> > > E: libopensc0: shlib-missing-in-control-file li
On 2002.08.28 03:03 Jay Graves wrote:
W: waimea: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
W: waimea: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
I am really not quite sure what to do here and I would really
appreciate
some guidance.
Thanks
Hi.
As lintian said, you have to write a simple prerm and postinst
Hi Jay,
Jay Graves wrote:
> fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
> branch and put it at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/. However I get
> these two lintian erros.
>
> W: waimea: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: waimea: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
[...]
Hi Giorgio,
Giorgio Mandolfo wrote:
> As lintian said, you have to write a simple prerm and postinst script
> (or add to your previous one) in the debian/ dir, that set the symlink
> to your extra documentation page (and remove it if you remove the
> package).
Not necessary anymore
Regard
On 2002.08.28 03:38 Rene Engelhard wrote:
Not necessary anymore
I see. That's the reason I sometimes do not see /usr/share/doc symlink
anymore. ;-)
___
If computers take over (which seems to be their natural tendency), it
will
serve us right.
-- Alistair Cooke
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 07:03:31PM -0600, Jay Graves wrote:
> Hello
> I have actively been trying to package the waimea window manager to be
> sponsored. There was an error in the 0.3.3 upstream code that has been
> fixed in the cvs branch. I have made a new package against the cvs
> branch and
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 21:18, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> Please remember to do a group reply, i.e. keep the Cc: to -mentors.
> Nothing private here :)
oops, didn't realise it. sorry debian-mentors 8)
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:02:59AM -0400, Joe Phillips wrote:
> > > > W: libopensc0: package-relat
Hello. I'm writing to ask if anyone has a few minutes of spare time to
sponsor my packages, and sign me off for advocate status for the debian
project.
The initial packages that I'm presenting are for everything (the engine that
powers Everything2.com, perlmonks.org, animefu.com, etc) and one of i
67 matches
Mail list logo
