Hello!
i want to get some experiance with debian developing and searching for
developer who have a time to check package. package is guardian for
snort (a lightweight intrustion detection system).
guardian watches the output from snort and uses ipchains or iptables to block attacker.
--
regards
I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
Here is my first mail to AM:
>
> From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Initial contact from NM applicant to AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 11:53:34 -0700
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
>
Hi Dimitry,
Dimitry Glushenok wrote:
> i want to get some experiance with debian developing and searching for
> developer who have a time to check package. package is guardian for
> snort (a lightweight intrustion detection system).
> guardian watches the output from snort and uses ipchains or i
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:44:30PM +0200, C?dric Delfosse wrote:
> Hello to the list.
>
> I have this problem since my complete upgrade to testing.
> When I tried to build my package, the process fails at debsign:
>
> dh_builddeb
> dpkg-deb: building package `darkstat' in `../darkstat_2.1-1_i386
Hi Rene,
there is sources: ftp://ftp.rasko.ru/pub/debian/guardian/
(guardian-1.6.0)
now version 1.7 available and i debianize it as soon as possible
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:39:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> Dimitry Glushenok wrote:
> > i want to get some experiance
Hi,
following annoying problem:
- a package uses debhelper, and dh_installinit
- dh_installinit adds code to maintainer scripts calling init script
on installation and deinstallation-
- init script uses start-stop-daemon
- start-stop-daemon barfs on start if daemon is already running, or on
Hi,
I am interested in becoming a Debian Developer, but am having a problem
with one of my first packages. The skeleton was generated using
dh_make, and contains the following lines:
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
-$(MAKE) distclean
-tes
> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Glushenok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dmitry> Hello! i want to get some experiance with debian
Dmitry> developing and searching for developer who have a time to
Dmitry> check package. package is guardian for snort (a
Dmitry> lightweight intrustion detecti
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> For the moment I commented these the cp lines out, and restored the
> original files from the tarball. However, what is the "proper" solution
> to this?
Have upstream update these themselves?
You may be unwittingly causing portabilit
Hi Ross!
You wrote:
> clean:
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp
> -$(MAKE) distclean
> -test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> -test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \
> cp -f /usr
Em Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:30:29 -0700, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
heya Osamu!
I think hmh is on vacations... he's my personal friend, and I think he's
very committed to Debian... maybe he's just away or had no time or network
connection to
Hi!
I packaged ZINF, the next-version freeamp (is not called freeamp
anymore since Amp is a trademark of PlayMedia Systems, Inc.). freeamp
is orphaned since some time now. IMO, the right thing would be, once
that ZINF is in unstable, to remove freeamp from unstable (freeamp and
zinf could be inst
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
Blame it on real life interfering on my Debian work :(
> comment on mailing list. I sent a personal e-mail wondering his
> health... No reply.
Uups... sorry about that :( They're sitting on the inbox, because
Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> % LANG=C debsign
> signfile ../darkstat_2.1-1.dsc Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gpg: skipped `Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>': secret key not
> available
> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
> /usr/bin/debsign: GPG
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a recommendation to make one's package better behaved? Using
> start-stop-daemon --oknodo does not seem to be the correct way since
> this turns off error detection completely.
Why do you think so? My man page says:
-o|--oknodo
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my packages, I copy the new config.{sub,guess} over the old ones
> in one of the build targets, and put a backup of the original ones
> back in the clean target.
You'll have to build-depend on autotools-dev, though ...
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Des
> So gpg will show you also your key when you use gpg -kv 'Cédric Delfosse
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'? And more important when you run gpg
> --list-secret-keys 'Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', does it show
> you a key with the uid 'Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'? It would
> be helpful to
Hic bir yerde bulup izleyemeyeceginiz icerigi size http://www.2seks.com sunuyor.
TURK VE AVRUPALI AMATOR KIZLAR
BULGAR KIZLARI
ROMEN HATUNLAR
TURK TECAVUZ FILMLERI
KIZLAR YURDU
ALMANYA'NIN SAPIK HATUNLARI
OTELDEKI GIZLI KAMERALAR
VE DAHASI...
Hepsi orjinal ve kaliteli kayitlar. Hemen gi
On 15 Aug 2002 17:56:58 +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there a recommendation to make one's package better behaved? Using
>> start-stop-daemon --oknodo does not seem to be the correct way since
>> this turns off error detection comp
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am interested in becoming a Debian Developer, but am having a problem
> with one of my first packages. The skeleton was generated using
> dh_make, and contains the following lines:
[copying config.sub and config.guess]
> For the m
Hello,
I was wondering about the 'statistics' on nm.debian.org: Seems there are
far away from reality, at least for the "Maximal" days of the "Awaiting
DAM Approval" stage:
Here is a lists of applicants waiting at this stage without any comments
from DAM or AM, neither phone contact needed, sor
Hello!
i want to get some experiance with debian developing and searching for
developer who have a time to check package. package is guardian for
snort (a lightweight intrustion detection system).
guardian watches the output from snort and uses ipchains or iptables to block
attacker.
--
regards
I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
Here is my first mail to AM:
>
> From: Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Initial contact from NM applicant to AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 11:53:34 -0700
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
>
>
Hi Dimitry,
Dimitry Glushenok wrote:
> i want to get some experiance with debian developing and searching for
> developer who have a time to check package. package is guardian for
> snort (a lightweight intrustion detection system).
> guardian watches the output from snort and uses ipchains or ip
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 11:44:30PM +0200, C?dric Delfosse wrote:
> Hello to the list.
>
> I have this problem since my complete upgrade to testing.
> When I tried to build my package, the process fails at debsign:
>
> dh_builddeb
> dpkg-deb: building package `darkstat' in `../darkstat_2.1-1_i386.
Hi Rene,
there is sources: ftp://ftp.rasko.ru/pub/debian/guardian/
(guardian-1.6.0)
now version 1.7 available and i debianize it as soon as possible
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:39:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Dimitry,
>
> Dimitry Glushenok wrote:
> > i want to get some experiance w
Hi,
following annoying problem:
- a package uses debhelper, and dh_installinit
- dh_installinit adds code to maintainer scripts calling init script
on installation and deinstallation-
- init script uses start-stop-daemon
- start-stop-daemon barfs on start if daemon is already running, or on
s
Hi,
I am interested in becoming a Debian Developer, but am having a problem
with one of my first packages. The skeleton was generated using
dh_make, and contains the following lines:
clean:
dh_testdir
dh_testroot
rm -f build-stamp
-$(MAKE) distclean
-test
> "Dmitry" == Dmitry Glushenok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dmitry> Hello! i want to get some experiance with debian
Dmitry> developing and searching for developer who have a time to
Dmitry> check package. package is guardian for snort (a
Dmitry> lightweight intrustion detectio
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> For the moment I commented these the cp lines out, and restored the
> original files from the tarball. However, what is the "proper" solution
> to this?
Have upstream update these themselves?
You may be unwittingly causing portability
Hi Ross!
You wrote:
> clean:
> dh_testdir
> dh_testroot
> rm -f build-stamp
> -$(MAKE) distclean
> -test -r /usr/share/misc/config.sub && \
> cp -f /usr/share/misc/config.sub config.sub
> -test -r /usr/share/misc/config.guess && \
> cp -f /usr/
Em Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:30:29 -0700, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
heya Osamu!
I think hmh is on vacations... he's my personal friend, and I think he's
very committed to Debian... maybe he's just away or had no time or network
connection to r
Hi!
I packaged ZINF, the next-version freeamp (is not called freeamp
anymore since Amp is a trademark of PlayMedia Systems, Inc.). freeamp
is orphaned since some time now. IMO, the right thing would be, once
that ZINF is in unstable, to remove freeamp from unstable (freeamp and
zinf could be insta
On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I am not mad but I am somewhat intrigued.
Blame it on real life interfering on my Debian work :(
> comment on mailing list. I sent a personal e-mail wondering his
> health... No reply.
Uups... sorry about that :( They're sitting on the inbox, because I
Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> % LANG=C debsign
> signfile ../darkstat_2.1-1.dsc Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> gpg: skipped `Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>': secret key not
> available
> gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
> /usr/bin/debsign: GPG e
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a recommendation to make one's package better behaved? Using
> start-stop-daemon --oknodo does not seem to be the correct way since
> this turns off error detection completely.
Why do you think so? My man page says:
-o|--oknodo
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my packages, I copy the new config.{sub,guess} over the old ones
> in one of the build targets, and put a backup of the original ones
> back in the clean target.
You'll have to build-depend on autotools-dev, though ...
--
Robbe
signature.ng
Descr
> So gpg will show you also your key when you use gpg -kv 'Cédric Delfosse
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'? And more important when you run gpg
> --list-secret-keys 'Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', does it show
> you a key with the uid 'Cédric Delfosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'? It would
> be helpful to p
Hic bir yerde bulup izleyemeyeceginiz icerigi size http://www.2seks.com sunuyor.
TURK VE AVRUPALI AMATOR KIZLAR
BULGAR KIZLARI
ROMEN HATUNLAR
TURK TECAVUZ FILMLERI
KIZLAR YURDU
ALMANYA'NIN SAPIK HATUNLARI
OTELDEKI GIZLI KAMERALAR
VE DAHASI...
Hepsi orjinal ve kaliteli kayitlar. Hemen giris yapin v
On 15 Aug 2002 17:56:58 +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there a recommendation to make one's package better behaved? Using
>> start-stop-daemon --oknodo does not seem to be the correct way since
>> this turns off error detection compl
On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am interested in becoming a Debian Developer, but am having a problem
> with one of my first packages. The skeleton was generated using
> dh_make, and contains the following lines:
[copying config.sub and config.guess]
> For the mo
Hello,
I was wondering about the 'statistics' on nm.debian.org: Seems there are
far away from reality, at least for the "Maximal" days of the "Awaiting
DAM Approval" stage:
Here is a lists of applicants waiting at this stage without any comments
from DAM or AM, neither phone contact needed, sort
42 matches
Mail list logo