unsubscribe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 07:33, Grant Bowman wrote:
>
> So, back to the issue at hand. The update_excuses looks like this:
>
> * evolution/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63) ['gnome-pilot']
> * out of date on arm: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from
>0.99
There friends,
This a "just in case" question.
I am packaging fkiss (see #106140). It was finally released under GPL
(yeeha!).
I see that in configure, upstream checks:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] says this is needed for Ultrix, if the X
# libraries were built with DECnet support. And [EMAIL
Thanks Andrew for your reply. I'll address the issue at hand first. I
don't know if Takuo subscribed so I'm CC'ing him too.
* Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011219 02:04]:
> On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 07:33, Grant Bowman wrote:
> > So, back to the issue at hand. The update_excuses looks like
Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MUST all platforms be fixed simultaneously?
Yes, evolution must be at the same version on all architectures. Archs
that were never able to build a package are exempt, so that these
hold-ups are usually due to a arch-specific regression.
http://buildd.d
* Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011219 13:10]:
> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > MUST all platforms be fixed simultaneously?
>
> Yes, evolution must be at the same version on all architectures. Archs
> that were never able to build a package are exempt, so that these
> hold-u
Hello,
I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for commit
the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the diff file ? or
use the bts command to close the bug.
Thanx for help.
--
Julien Lemoine / SpeedBlue
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19-Dec-2001 Speed Blue wrote:
> Hello,
> I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for
commit
> the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the diff file ? or
> use the bts command to close the bug.
>
just reply to the bug number and include the patch (_
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:48:55PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 19-Dec-2001 Speed Blue wrote:
> > I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for
> > commit the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the diff file ? or use the bts command to close
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:46:55PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Given the stability of the interfaces to evolution (gtkhtml, camel, ...)
> I know that if _I_ was the DD responsible I wouldn't be too stressed for
> the missing architectures at this stage. Once we get the base system
> ready in
Title: ::: Ãßõ! µå¶óÀ̺êÄÚ½º :::
hello,
> > just reply to the bug number and include the patch (_NOT_ as an
> > attachment) and then tag the bug "patch". It is the maintainer's job to
> > then apply the patch, test, release and close the bug.
>
> Yep - absolutely *don't* send mail to n-done@bugs if you're not the
> maintain
unsubscribe
On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 07:33, Grant Bowman wrote:
>
> So, back to the issue at hand. The update_excuses looks like this:
>
> * evolution/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63)
> ['gnome-pilot']
> * out of date on arm: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from
> 0
There friends,
This a "just in case" question.
I am packaging fkiss (see #106140). It was finally released under GPL
(yeeha!).
I see that in configure, upstream checks:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] says this is needed for Ultrix, if the X
# libraries were built with DECnet support. And [EMAIL
Thanks Andrew for your reply. I'll address the issue at hand first. I
don't know if Takuo subscribed so I'm CC'ing him too.
* Andrew McMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011219 02:04]:
> On Wed, 2001-12-19 at 07:33, Grant Bowman wrote:
> > So, back to the issue at hand. The update_excuses looks like t
Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> MUST all platforms be fixed simultaneously?
Yes, evolution must be at the same version on all architectures. Archs
that were never able to build a package are exempt, so that these
hold-ups are usually due to a arch-specific regression.
http://buildd.de
* Robert Bihlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011219 13:10]:
> Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > MUST all platforms be fixed simultaneously?
>
> Yes, evolution must be at the same version on all architectures. Archs
> that were never able to build a package are exempt, so that these
> hold-up
Hello,
I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for
commit
the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the diff file ? or
use the bts command to close the bug.
Thanx for help.
--
Julien Lemoine / SpeedBlue
On 19-Dec-2001 Speed Blue wrote:
> Hello,
> I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for
commit
> the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the diff file ? or
> use the bts command to close the bug.
>
just reply to the bug number and include the patch (_N
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 03:48:55PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 19-Dec-2001 Speed Blue wrote:
> > I have fix the bug #122994 for bison, I'd like to know what to do for
> > commit the fix. Do I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the diff file ? or use the bts command to close
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 10:46:55PM +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Given the stability of the interfaces to evolution (gtkhtml, camel, ...)
> I know that if _I_ was the DD responsible I wouldn't be too stressed for
> the missing architectures at this stage. Once we get the base system
> ready in J
Title: ::: 추천! 드라이브코스 :::
23 matches
Mail list logo
