On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> I think a lot of documents need pstoimg and nowadays a lot of people
> just use plain apt. Upgrading gs from recommends to depends should be
> ok. Most people who have tex system running would have gs anyway.
This reasoning exac
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This reasoning exactly describes a "Recommends" relationship. It's not
> the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends.
FWIW, dselect and aptitude (and probably other frontends I don't know)
support it fine.
We also don't remove acce
Dear friends...
I finally fixed it. It was a problem in my debian/rules file.
I was not making a propper install.
Thanks for your time and advice.
--
.''`. "No tengo el coño pa ruidos" -- David Amor, dear friend
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (Kernel 2.4.9)
OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximian bug below.
It's all you, big guy.
http://bugs.debian.org/123769
I hope these Debian build system issu
* Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:56]:
> OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
> definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
> summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximian bug below.
in one quick sentance:
READ THE FUCKING INF
* Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:23]:
> * Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:56]:
> > OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
> > definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
> > summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximia
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "GB" == Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
GB> Takuo asked me what to do, so he doesn't know. He's the maintainer. I
GB> have recently had interactions with Takuo over other items as well,
GB> especially as it relates to debian-qa. I think yo
* Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:58]:
> premature conclusions because you are not yet familiar enough with the
> full situation to understand.
Yes, I do, you have no idea what the heck 'woody/testing' ment when you
put it in your sources file.
Therefore, you bug-report everything bi
* Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:37]:
> * Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:58]:
> > premature conclusions because you are not yet familiar enough with the
> > full situation to understand.
>
> Yes, I do, you have no idea what the heck 'woody/testing' ment when you
> put it i
Title: ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ¹«·á ÀüȹøÈ£ µî·Ï°ú ÃÖÀú°¡ Àüȱâ ÆǸŠÀ̺¥Æ® !
ÀúÈñ Çï·Î¿ìÅÚÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿¹¾à°¡ÀÔÀ» ÇϽŠ°í°´´Ôµé¿¡°Ô °¨»çÀÇ
¸¶À½À» ÀüÇÏ°íÀÚÀÎÅͳݿë US
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:33AM +1100, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote:
> I think a lot of documents need pstoimg and nowadays a lot of people
> just use plain apt. Upgrading gs from recommends to depends should be
> ok. Most people who have tex system running would have gs anyway.
This reasoning exact
Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This reasoning exactly describes a "Recommends" relationship. It's not
> the package's fault that apt-get doesn't support Recommends.
FWIW, dselect and aptitude (and probably other frontends I don't know)
support it fine.
We also don't remove accen
Dear friends...
I finally fixed it. It was a problem in my debian/rules file.
I was not making a propper install.
Thanks for your time and advice.
--
.''`. "No tengo el coño pa ruidos" -- David Amor, dear friend
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (Kernel 2.4.9)
OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximian bug below.
It's all you, big guy.
http://bugs.debian.org/123769
I hope these Debian build system issue
* Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:56]:
> OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
> definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
> summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximian bug below.
in one quick sentance:
READ THE FUCKING INFO
* Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:23]:
> * Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 14:56]:
> > OK, Takuo, The bug I filed with Ximian's bugzilla has a pretty
> > definitive answer at the end. First I've attached the message with a
> > summary of bug 123769, then I've attached the Ximian
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "GB" == Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
GB> Takuo asked me what to do, so he doesn't know. He's the maintainer. I
GB> have recently had interactions with Takuo over other items as well,
GB> especially as it relates to debian-qa. I think you
* Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:58]:
> premature conclusions because you are not yet familiar enough with the
> full situation to understand.
Yes, I do, you have no idea what the heck 'woody/testing' ment when you
put it in your sources file.
Therefore, you bug-report everything bit
* Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:37]:
> * Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011217 16:58]:
> > premature conclusions because you are not yet familiar enough with the
> > full situation to understand.
>
> Yes, I do, you have no idea what the heck 'woody/testing' ment when you
> put it in
19 matches
Mail list logo
