Re: Question about packaging of mosixview.

2001-11-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:13:18PM -0800, Viral Shah wrote: > mosixview is a GUI admin tool for the mosix cluster. > > mosix is available only for the i386 architecture. mosixview, however > builds for all architectures, but being a mosix admin tool, is useful only > on i386 machines. Is it po

Re: "harry up for freeze" strangeness

2001-11-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway way the problem was not reported to me as a bug by the > autobuilders? Well, the porters obviously have to care to even more portability bugs than a single maintainer, so not every bug will be reported immediately. > If I haven't check it

Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello! I'm packaging a small tool using libnet, and found a lintian error I can't manage: enrico@marvin:~/dev$ lintian -vi guessnet_0.9-1_i386.changes N: Processing changes file guessnet_0.9-1_i386.changes ... N: Setting up lab in /tmp/lintian-lab.21790 ... N: Processing source package guessnet

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 > N: > N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than > N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some tools > > enrico@marvin:~/dev/guessnet-0.9

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 10-Nov-2001 Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: >> E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 >> N: >> N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than >> N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some to

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:26:17AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > >> E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 > >> N: > >> N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than > >> N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some tools > >> > >> enrico

sourceforge sucks

2001-11-10 Thread Yven Johannes Leist
das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-(( Gruß Yven -- Yven Leist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.yven.beldesign.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: sourceforge sucks

2001-11-10 Thread Yven Johannes Leist
On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote: > das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft > langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-(( > Gruß > Yven sorry for the inconvenience, this message was not supposed to go here, I must have hit the wron

Question about packaging of mosixview.

2001-11-10 Thread Viral Shah
Hi, mosixview is a GUI admin tool for the mosix cluster. mosix is available only for the i386 architecture. mosixview, however builds for all architectures, but being a mosix admin tool, is useful only on i386 machines. So, should I build mosixview only for i386, or let it build for all archite

Re: "harry up for freeze" strangeness

2001-11-10 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Tnx for the answers, On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:06:41PM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > ... > > How can I manage to retry the built? > > Again: on sparc the built was not tried at all, but last upload was a > > lot of time ago, how can I manage to try the built? > > You'll need to talk to the port

Re: "harry up for freeze" strangeness

2001-11-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway way the problem was not reported to me as a bug by the > autobuilders? Well, the porters obviously have to care to even more portability bugs than a single maintainer, so not every bug will be reported immediately. > If I haven't check it t

Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Enrico Zini
Hello! I'm packaging a small tool using libnet, and found a lintian error I can't manage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev$ lintian -vi guessnet_0.9-1_i386.changes N: Processing changes file guessnet_0.9-1_i386.changes ... N: Setting up lab in /tmp/lintian-lab.21790 ... N: Processing source package guessn

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: > E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 > N: > N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than > N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some tools > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dev/guessnet-

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 10-Nov-2001 Josip Rodin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote: >> E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 >> N: >> N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than >> N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some too

Re: Duplicate relations in dpkg-shlibdeps output

2001-11-10 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:26:17AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > >> E: guessnet: package-has-a-duplicate-relation libpcap0 > >> N: > >> N: The package seems to declare a relation on another package more than > >> N: once. This is not only sloppy but can break some tools > >> > >> [EMAIL

sourceforge sucks

2001-11-10 Thread Yven Johannes Leist
das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-(( Gruß Yven -- Yven Leist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.yven.beldesign.de

Re: sourceforge sucks

2001-11-10 Thread Yven Johannes Leist
On Saturday 10 November 2001 18:13, Yven Johannes Leist wrote: > das mit dem release könnte noch dauern, suckforge ist gerade grauenhaft > langsam bis überhaupt nicht mehr responding :-(( > Gruß > Yven sorry for the inconvenience, this message was not supposed to go here, I must have hit the wrong

Question about packaging of mosixview.

2001-11-10 Thread Viral Shah
Hi, mosixview is a GUI admin tool for the mosix cluster. mosix is available only for the i386 architecture. mosixview, however builds for all architectures, but being a mosix admin tool, is useful only on i386 machines. So, should I build mosixview only for i386, or let it build for all architec

Re: Question about packaging of mosixview.

2001-11-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 02:13:18PM -0800, Viral Shah wrote: > mosixview is a GUI admin tool for the mosix cluster. > > mosix is available only for the i386 architecture. mosixview, however > builds for all architectures, but being a mosix admin tool, is useful only > on i386 machines. Is it pos