On 27-Oct-2001 peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am planning to package a Python script that will aid another package
> I already have in Debian. Since I don't really know much about Python I
> wonder what packages I need to depend on. Is it enough to depend on
> python-base?
>
> The script sta
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> >
> > Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > > Processin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> [...]
> > I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
>
> Unfortunately not, although the
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry:
> Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a peak.
And... where do I find that?
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.htm
Hi ...
I try to pack glibwww, the name of the packages are glibwww1 and
glibwww-dev. The shared lib is known as libglibwww.so.1.0.0.
But I have problems with understandment the shlibs-system. I have under
debian the shlibs files with the contents.
shlibs:
libglibwww 0.2 libglibwww1 (>> 0.2-0)
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:42:32AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a peak.
>
> And... where do I find that?
I'd take a wild stab, and guess at the debian-policy archives.
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Culus
Josip Rodin dijo:
> That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people
> shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then
> neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer
> releases of software, too :)
IMNSHO, the bug is
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:05AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:42:32AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
| > > Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a peak.
| >
| > And... where do I find that?
|
| I'd take a wild stab, and guess at the
Are there any resources anywhere to help me create a package for kernel
modules that will work with make-kpkg?
Or is it best just to look at other modules packages and borrow?
--
Duncan Findlay
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
Hi!
I am planning to package a Python script that will aid another package
I already have in Debian. Since I don't really know much about Python I
wonder what packages I need to depend on. Is it enough to depend on
python-base?
The script starts with these lines:
import sys
import nntplib
import
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
[...]
> I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators s
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:28:45AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've got a package of the Xfm filemanager.
Is this the same as the one already in unstable?
Package: xfm
Priority: optional
Section: utils
Installed-Size: 2160
Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i38
First, thanks for your quick reply :-)
Santiago Vila dijo:
> After a bug is archived, it is available for search, but its history
> is "frozen", so no commands to change its status are accepted.
Ack.
> Somebody suggested once a "resurrect" command for this, but not everybody
> likes the idea of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 no
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> This is the answer I get from the BTS:
>
> Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> reopen 109629
> > Bug number 109629 no
On 27-Oct-2001 peter karlsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am planning to package a Python script that will aid another package
> I already have in Debian. Since I don't really know much about Python I
> wonder what packages I need to depend on. Is it enough to depend on
> python-base?
>
> The script star
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:26:37AM -0200, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> >
> > Debian Bug Tracking System said:
> > > Processing
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 05:27:25PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one.
> > This is the answer I get from the BTS:
> [...]
> > I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore?
>
> Unfortunately not, although the B
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry:
> Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a peak.
And... where do I find that?
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law:
http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
Hi ...
I try to pack glibwww, the name of the packages are glibwww1 and
glibwww-dev. The shared lib is known as libglibwww.so.1.0.0.
But I have problems with understandment the shlibs-system. I have under
debian the shlibs files with the contents.
shlibs:
libglibwww 0.2 libglibwww1 (>> 0.2-0)
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:42:32AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> > Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a
> > peak.
>
> And... where do I find that?
I'd take a wild stab, and guess at the debian-policy archives.
Mike.
--
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
Josip Rodin dijo:
> That's primarily because it's worked like this for years, and because people
> shouldn't ever need this as the bugs shouldn't get wrongly closed and then
> neglected for a month. Theoretically, bugs shouldn't reappear in newer
> releases of software, too :)
IMNSHO, the bug is f
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:39:05AM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:42:32AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
| > > Gregor just posted his draft of the python packaging policy. Give it a
peak.
| >
| > And... where do I find that?
|
| I'd take a wild stab, and guess at the
Are there any resources anywhere to help me create a package for kernel
modules that will work with make-kpkg?
Or is it best just to look at other modules packages and borrow?
--
Duncan Findlay
24 matches
Mail list logo
