Re: New key procedure

2001-10-27 Thread David Caldwell
On Friday, October 26, 2001 05:04:36 +0200 Alexander List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 25 Oct 2001, James Troup wrote: > >> Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored. >> Alexander's key is new. > > OK, as I want to switch from PGP to GPG, I did as told (and mentioned in >

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: > > Debian Bug Tracking System said: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> reopen 109629 > > Bug number 109629 n

Python scripts

2001-10-27 Thread peter karlsson
Hi! I am planning to package a Python script that will aid another package I already have in Debian. Since I don't really know much about Python I wonder what packages I need to depend on. Is it enough to depend on python-base? The script starts with these lines: import sys import nntplib impor

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Amaya
First, thanks for your quick reply :-) Santiago Vila dijo: > After a bug is archived, it is available for search, but its history > is "frozen", so no commands to change its status are accepted. Ack. > Somebody suggested once a "resurrect" command for this, but not everybody > likes the idea o

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: > > Debian Bug Tracking System said: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> reopen 109629 > > Bug number 109629 n

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Carlos Laviola
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: > > Debian Bug Tracking System said: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> reopen 109629 > > Bug number 109629 n

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: [...] > I guess it's older than 28 days, but... can't I access it anymore? Unfortunately not, although the BTS administrators

Re: Yet another person looking for advocate

2001-10-27 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:28:45AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've got a package of the Xfm filemanager. Is this the same as the one already in unstable? Package: xfm Priority: optional Section: utils Installed-Size: 2160 Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: i3

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Santiago Vila
Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: > > Debian Bug Tracking System said: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> reopen 109629 > > Bug number 109629 not found. > > > >> tags 109629 upstream > >

Re: New key procedure

2001-10-27 Thread David Caldwell
On Friday, October 26, 2001 05:04:36 +0200 Alexander List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 25 Oct 2001, James Troup wrote: Anybody can update existing keys but new keys will be ignored. Alexander's key is new. OK, as I want to switch from PGP to GPG, I did as told (and mentioned in the Develop

Re: [BTS] Bug number $bug not found.

2001-10-27 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Amaya wrote: > I am trying to reopen a bug, tag it and merge it with a more recent one. > This is the answer I get from the BTS: > > Debian Bug Tracking System said: > > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > >> reopen 109629 > > Bug number 109629 no