Re: creating a pakage with 2 binaries

2001-06-16 Thread Richard Atterer
Hello, On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 07:29:43AM +0200, Nikolaus Regnat wrote: > Has someone a solution for my installation problem? Compilation and > building went fine, but I don´t know how the command for the > installation should look like. > > $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/pakage

Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Stephan A Suerken
Hi, I would like anyone to comment if I am right on these points. o There's currently no standard way (for developers) to test the building of packages on public (alien arch) machines. [ What I have in mind is a s.th. like a chroot environment like on vore, but with some add-on to allow d

Re: Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Stephan A Suerken
Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > o There is no (standard) way to get autobuilder buildlogs. Blushing, I rembered that the answer (at least for the official archs) for that is obviously update_excuses, where are links to appropriate autobuilder buildlogs (and hence autobuilder mach

Re: Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Rick Younie
Stephan A Suerken wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like anyone to comment if I am right on these points. > > o There's currently no standard way (for developers) to test > the building of packages on public (alien arch) machines. In general, if your package builds ok in a chroot environment with just

Re: creating a pakage with 2 binaries

2001-06-16 Thread Richard Atterer
Hello, On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 07:29:43AM +0200, Nikolaus Regnat wrote: > Has someone a solution for my installation problem? Compilation and > building went fine, but I don´t know how the command for the > installation should look like. > > $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/pakage

Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Stephan A Suerken
Hi, I would like anyone to comment if I am right on these points. o There's currently no standard way (for developers) to test the building of packages on public (alien arch) machines. [ What I have in mind is a s.th. like a chroot environment like on vore, but with some add-on to allow de

Re: Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Stephan A Suerken
Stephan A Suerken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > o There is no (standard) way to get autobuilder buildlogs. Blushing, I rembered that the answer (at least for the official archs) for that is obviously update_excuses, where are links to appropriate autobuilder buildlogs (and hence autobuilder mac

Re: Clarification: ports, archs, autobuilders

2001-06-16 Thread Rick Younie
Stephan A Suerken wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like anyone to comment if I am right on these points. > > o There's currently no standard way (for developers) to test > the building of packages on public (alien arch) machines. In general, if your package builds ok in a chroot environment with jus