On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 04:26:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1
> > > is
> > > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant
> > > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org
Hi,
I'm maintaining mosix. The control file has sections for 3 packages,
the binaries, devel files and kernel patch.
Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
Section: net
How do I specify this in the control file ?
Also, I changed the priority of my packages to e
Thus spoke Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-31 15:01:25:
>
> Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> Section: net
>
> How do I specify this in the control file ?
> Also, I changed the priority of my packages to extra.
>
Add a Section: to each package.
Lik
The license (which is in the download directory of the FTP server and
presumably in the source package as well) is GPL 2.1.
This package is a very powerful and exciting way of measuring performance of
a network of machines. If used correctly it can allow you to visualise the
way that load on o
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010531 11:38]:
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
>
> Add a Section: to each package.
>
> Like this:
Also, see pop3lite if you want an example. ;-)
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-31 15:01:25:
> >
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
> >
> > How do I specify this in the control file ?
> > Also, I changed th
Hi,
dh_makeshlibs puts ldconfig in postinst and postrm.
However, lintian complains about ldconfig being run from postrm, and refers
to ch. 9 of the policy.
What am I missing here, or is it only applicable to a specific case ?
Thanks,
viral
--
Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried that, but it doesn't seem to work.
> It seems to be ignored, because after installing them, and using
> apt-cache show, I don't get the correct result.
"apt-cache show" sometimes displays multiple records. Are you sure
you're not looking at the wrong o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> When I installed pure-ftpd_0.98.4-1_i386.deb , at the end of the
> install pure-ftpd said "Starting ftp server: pure-ftpd" and nothing
> else happened, i.e. I do not have the prompt, "enter" do not give me
> the prompt.If I do a ps I cans see that perl and debconf are stil
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:36:34AM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > When I installed pure-ftpd_0.98.4-1_i386.deb , at the end of the
> > install pure-ftpd said "Starting ftp server: pure-ftpd" and nothing
> > else happened, i.e. I do not have the prompt, "enter" do not give me
> > the prompt.If I do a
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>dh_makeshlibs puts ldconfig in postinst and postrm.
>However, lintian complains about ldconfig being run from postrm, and refers
>to ch. 9 of the policy.
>
>What am I missing here, or is it only applicable to a specific case ?
You're missing bugs #82479, #92236, #
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> This is weird, because the only thing left in the postinst is:
>> [orr](0) % tail /var/lib/dpkg/info/pure-ftpd.postinst
>> # End automatically added section
>> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
>> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; th
Colin Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:57:30 +1000
>Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>|On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Colin Fowler wrote:
>|> No Readme - no License - no Copyright. I just took them all, put them
>|> together
>|> Copyright:
>|> Each theme r
Hello mentors.
I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package
is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small
set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and hope
at some stage to feed these diffs upstream (things
Je Thu, 31 May 2001 11:54:09 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Lunz) scribis:
> >> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
> >> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; then
> >> update-rc.d pure-ftpd defaults >/dev/null
> >> /etc/init.d/pure-ftpd start
> >>
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:18:30AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package
> is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small
> set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and h
I would avoid this sort of thing if I were you. If I were upstream I
would not accept such patches, and even when I am upstream I like to keep
debian specific stuff out of the upstream source. Autoconf only exists
because unix standardization is poor, we don't want Linux distributions to
balkani
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:52:36PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried that, but it doesn't seem to work.
> > It seems to be ignored, because after installing them, and using
> > apt-cache show, I don't get the correct result.
>
> "apt-cache show" som
I also do not think that packages should be descriminated because they
are in another language than english.
Being a swede myself, I'm of course interested in packages available in
swedish. However, I currently dont see myself learning japanese or
another language than those I already know, and is
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:54:09AM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> >> This is weird, because the only thing left in the postinst is:
> >> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
> >> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; then
> >> update-rc.d pure-ftpd defaults >/dev/null
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Is there a way to have debhelper do that? Or should I just not be using
>> debhelper for this and put correct code in the postinst myself?
> You could add it yourself and use dh_installinit -n, that's what I did for
> xinetd. Or try what Itai suggested.
Itai's suggestion
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:45:00PM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > Well, some feel debconf is at fault here, mercilessly taking
> > possession of stdout :)
>
> I knew it probably had something to do with that, I just didn't expect
> that debconf and debhelper would conflict like that.
Well, it's not
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:37:12PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> What I would like is to have some sort of flag or meta information to
> indicate what language/es a package contain, so I can write a script
> to easily weed out packages I know I will never use (and maybe include
> packages in
Hi all,
I'm trying to put together my own package for gnu-smalltalk, and I'm getting
there, but I have some general questions.
The current package is split into a main package and a docs package. It's
based on gst 1.8.1 and I'm working with 1.95.4. There are some major changes
in the package wrt
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 04:26:37PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > I'm currently the Maintainer of libfile-temp-perl which as of perl 5.6.1 is
> > > included in the main Perl distribution. As the package is now redundant
> > > should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org askin
Hi,
I'm maintaining mosix. The control file has sections for 3 packages,
the binaries, devel files and kernel patch.
Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
Section: net
How do I specify this in the control file ?
Also, I changed the priority of my packages to
Thus spoke Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-31 15:01:25:
>
> Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> Section: net
>
> How do I specify this in the control file ?
> Also, I changed the priority of my packages to extra.
>
Add a Section: to each package.
Li
The license (which is in the download directory of the FTP server and
presumably in the source package as well) is GPL 2.1.
This package is a very powerful and exciting way of measuring performance of
a network of machines. If used correctly it can allow you to visualise the
way that load on
* Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20010531 11:38]:
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
>
> Add a Section: to each package.
>
> Like this:
Also, see pop3lite if you want an example. ;-)
--
Martin Michlma
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:38:49AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> Thus spoke Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2001-05-31 15:01:25:
> >
> > Now, the devel files should have Section: devel and the rest should have
> > Section: net
> >
> > How do I specify this in the control file ?
> > Also, I changed t
Hi,
dh_makeshlibs puts ldconfig in postinst and postrm.
However, lintian complains about ldconfig being run from postrm, and refers
to ch. 9 of the policy.
What am I missing here, or is it only applicable to a specific case ?
Thanks,
viral
--
Every year is getting shorter, never seem to find
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried that, but it doesn't seem to work.
> It seems to be ignored, because after installing them, and using
> apt-cache show, I don't get the correct result.
"apt-cache show" sometimes displays multiple records. Are you sure
you're not looking at the wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> When I installed pure-ftpd_0.98.4-1_i386.deb , at the end of the
> install pure-ftpd said "Starting ftp server: pure-ftpd" and nothing
> else happened, i.e. I do not have the prompt, "enter" do not give me
> the prompt.If I do a ps I cans see that perl and debconf are sti
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:36:34AM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > When I installed pure-ftpd_0.98.4-1_i386.deb , at the end of the
> > install pure-ftpd said "Starting ftp server: pure-ftpd" and nothing
> > else happened, i.e. I do not have the prompt, "enter" do not give me
> > the prompt.If I do a
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>dh_makeshlibs puts ldconfig in postinst and postrm.
>However, lintian complains about ldconfig being run from postrm, and refers
>to ch. 9 of the policy.
>
>What am I missing here, or is it only applicable to a specific case ?
You're missing bugs #82479, #92236,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> This is weird, because the only thing left in the postinst is:
>> [orr](0) % tail /var/lib/dpkg/info/pure-ftpd.postinst
>> # End automatically added section
>> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
>> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; t
Colin Fowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, 28 May 2001 21:57:30 +1000
>Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>|On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 01:31:14PM +0100, Colin Fowler wrote:
>|> No Readme - no License - no Copyright. I just took them all, put them
>|> together
>|> Copyright:
>|> Each theme
Hello mentors.
I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package
is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small
set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and hope
at some stage to feed these diffs upstream (thing
Je Thu, 31 May 2001 11:54:09 -0400,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Lunz) scribis:
> >> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
> >> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; then
> >> update-rc.d pure-ftpd defaults >/dev/null
> >> /etc/init.d/pure-ftpd start
> >>
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:18:30AM +0800, James Bromberger wrote:
> I've been thinking about an autoconf test I have for checking that my package
> is being created on a Debian system. The reason is that I have a very small
> set of diffs that I want applied to the package only for Debian, and
I would avoid this sort of thing if I were you. If I were upstream I
would not accept such patches, and even when I am upstream I like to keep
debian specific stuff out of the upstream source. Autoconf only exists
because unix standardization is poor, we don't want Linux distributions to
balkan
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:52:36PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I tried that, but it doesn't seem to work.
> > It seems to be ignored, because after installing them, and using
> > apt-cache show, I don't get the correct result.
>
> "apt-cache show" so
I also do not think that packages should be descriminated because they
are in another language than english.
Being a swede myself, I'm of course interested in packages available in
swedish. However, I currently dont see myself learning japanese or
another language than those I already know, and i
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:54:09AM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> >> This is weird, because the only thing left in the postinst is:
> >> # Automatically added by dh_installinit
> >> if [ -e "/etc/init.d/pure-ftpd" ]; then
> >> update-rc.d pure-ftpd defaults >/dev/null
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Is there a way to have debhelper do that? Or should I just not be using
>> debhelper for this and put correct code in the postinst myself?
> You could add it yourself and use dh_installinit -n, that's what I did for
> xinetd. Or try what Itai suggested.
Itai's suggestio
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:45:00PM -0400, Jason Lunz wrote:
> > Well, some feel debconf is at fault here, mercilessly taking
> > possession of stdout :)
>
> I knew it probably had something to do with that, I just didn't expect
> that debconf and debhelper would conflict like that.
Well, it's no
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:37:12PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote:
> What I would like is to have some sort of flag or meta information to
> indicate what language/es a package contain, so I can write a script
> to easily weed out packages I know I will never use (and maybe include
> packages in
Hi all,
I'm trying to put together my own package for gnu-smalltalk, and I'm getting
there, but I have some general questions.
The current package is split into a main package and a docs package. It's
based on gst 1.8.1 and I'm working with 1.95.4. There are some major changes
in the package wr
Hi,
Is there a page that tells about the arches that a package was successfully
compiled for ? Problems etc ?
Thanks,
viral
--
"Live for today, gone tomorrow, that's me, HaHaHaa!"
PGP signature
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 12:08:58PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a page that tells about the arches that a package was successfully
> compiled for ? Problems etc ?
Maybe you want to look at http://buildd.debian.org. This is the closest I can
think of...
Cheers,
B.
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
50 matches
Mail list logo
