On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
>
> >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> >to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> >solu
Hi,
I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
with dh_installkpatches. The other is a tar file, which has to be untarred
in /usr/src/linux.
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> > solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> I've been look
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, with dh_installinit, the init.d script gets a default priority of
>20. How do I change it ?
>
>I tried dh_installinit -- defaults s90 k10
>
>It makes the debs fine, but during installation, update-rc.d grumbles of
>bad parameters. Am I using the wrong syntax
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:18:18PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
> tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
>
> It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
> with dh_installkpatches. T
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
> and arch-independant (documentation).
[...]
Check out /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi*
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
mail to the upstream maintainter
cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc to the bug reporter
I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
the bug has been signed as forwarded.
But on my personal bugs page (bug
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
>
> mail to the upstream maintainter
> cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc to the bug reporter
>
> I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
> the bug
I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi,
The targets are like so:
binary-indep: build install
binary-arch: build install
Both `binary-indep` and `binary-ar
Hello all,
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
if it is, make install will install aditiona
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
> stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
> conditionally install some files.
>
> I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
> if it is, mak
Hello there,
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with the right .c
> I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
> replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
> drivers plus some networking option.
>
> My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
> binary (along with the right .con
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
> bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
>
> Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi,
> The targets are like so:
>
> binary-i
Em Wed, 23 May 2001 10:52:20 -0400
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Why don't you just build-depend on the GNOME stuff so that every
> architecture will have a similar package?
I won't just compile the gnome stuff in it cause I don't think my little
program should depend on the *
Hi,
How does one create a kernel patch.
I tried diff -r --new-files -u
But the resulting patch didn't apply correctly.
I also noticed that my paths were hardcoded in the patch, but I believe
I can solve that by using relative paths.
Either ways, whats the correct way to create a patchfile ?
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:06:01PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I have one more question... I set up new commands for distclean: and
> clean: rules in my Makefile.am like this:
>
> distclean:
> rm -f `find . -name \*~`
> rm -f po/*.gmo
> clean:
> rm -f `find . -nam
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
> stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
> conditionally install some files.
Well, here's what one of my projects do:
configure.in:
...
AC_CHECK_LI
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
the bug is #96254, package xstr.
and this is the mail that i received after forwarding the bug:
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 05:18:34 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
>
> the bug is #96254, package xstr.
oops, i made a mistake on the bug number, really sorry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
> > bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
> >
> > Take for example /usr/share/doc/d
Colin Watson wrote:
> Unfortunately some packages still use it; there are 68 packages in the
> archive that build-depend on it. It's not clear that use of debmake can
> be considered a bug unless it's actually broken.
And really quite a few more seem to use it according to the graph
somewhere on m
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
>
> Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
>
> `binary-arch' builds the binary packages
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
> Any hint ?
for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, and just made
the packages use renamed config files.
it makes things easy
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > `binary-arch' builds the binary packages which are specific to a
> > particular architecture, and `binary-indep' builds those which are
> > not.
>
> Thanks for pointing me to /usr/share/doc/debhelpe
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
>
> Ok I'll find 2 tests machine.
>
You also may use User mode Linux to play with virtual Debian machine
Rémi Perrot
pgpdbhJrfP6zm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> >to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> >solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
> >
> >cu
> >Adrian
>
> I'm just looking for the 'better s
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:42:58AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:22:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just adopted xabacus.
> >
> > It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
> > the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
> >
> maybe usi
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:11:48PM -0700, Brett Cundal wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
> >
> > >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > >to rem
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:30:13PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
> > Any hint ?
>
> for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, a
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:49:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > >to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> > >solutions in Debian when two packages share the sam
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> It seems the best solution indeed. Is there a way to know if a package has
> been purged ? dpkg --test-purge ?
You'll have to play with dpkg -s | grep Status: I guess
--
see shy jo
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> > solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> I've been loo
Viral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Also, with dh_installinit, the init.d script gets a default priority of
>20. How do I change it ?
>
>I tried dh_installinit -- defaults s90 k10
>
>It makes the debs fine, but during installation, update-rc.d grumbles of
>bad parameters. Am I using the wrong syntax
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:18:18PM +0530, Viral wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am packaging mosix, which is a cluster computing tool which does fault
> tolerance, load balancing and process migration.
>
> It comes as 2 kernel patches. One is a standard kernel patch which I handle
> with dh_installkpatches.
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 09:17:02PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a multi-binary package which produce arch-dependant .deb (binaries)
> and arch-independant (documentation).
[...]
Check out /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi*
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
mail to the upstream maintainter
cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc to the bug reporter
I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
the bug has been signed as forwarded.
But on my personal bugs page ([E
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I have forwarded a bug to an upstream maintainer doing the following:
>
> mail to the upstream maintainter
> cc to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc to the bug reporter
>
> I have also received a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that told me that
> the bug
Hello all,
I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
conditionally install some files.
I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
if it is, make install will install adition
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
> stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
> conditionally install some files.
>
> I want it to test if GNOME is available (it is being done in configure),
> if it is, ma
Hello there,
I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
drivers plus some networking option.
My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
binary (along with the right .
> I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
> replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
> drivers plus some networking option.
>
> My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
> binary (along with the right .co
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
> bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
>
> Take for example /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.multi,
> The targets are like so:
>
> binary-
Em Wed, 23 May 2001 10:52:20 -0400
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Why don't you just build-depend on the GNOME stuff so that every
> architecture will have a similar package?
I won't just compile the gnome stuff in it cause I don't think my little
program should depend on the
Hi,
How does one create a kernel patch.
I tried diff -r --new-files -u
But the resulting patch didn't apply correctly.
I also noticed that my paths were hardcoded in the patch, but I believe
I can solve that by using relative paths.
Either ways, whats the correct way to create a patchfile ?
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:06:01PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I have one more question... I set up new commands for distclean: and
> clean: rules in my Makefile.am like this:
>
> distclean:
> rm -f `find . -name \*~`
> rm -f po/*.gmo
> clean:
> rm -f `find . -na
On Wed, 23 May 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I need help with stuff regarding a configure.in and a Makefile.am, I'm
> stucked trying to find a way to make the 'make install' command
> conditionally install some files.
Well, here's what one of my projects do:
configure.in:
...
AC_CHECK_L
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
the bug is #96254, package xstr.
and this is the mail that i received after forwarding the bug:
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 05:18:34 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I plan to distribute a custom kernel for the installation bootdisk of
>>replicator. This is mainly a monolitic kernel with all network cards
>>drivers plus some networking option.
>>
>> My question is : can I compile this by hand and then only release the
>>binary
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 06:51:42PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:49:38PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> > It would help if you told us the bug number you are talking about.
>
> the bug is #96254, package xstr.
oops, i made a mistake on the bug number, really sorr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:09:03AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > I should probably shut up about this, but something has always
> > bugged me (which means I'm probably doing it wrong).
> >
> > Take for example /usr/share/doc/
Colin Watson wrote:
> Unfortunately some packages still use it; there are 68 packages in the
> archive that build-depend on it. It's not clear that use of debmake can
> be considered a bug unless it's actually broken.
And really quite a few more seem to use it according to the graph
somewhere on
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does the policy requires this ? (I read it but it was unclear (to me:))
>
> Yes, in section 5.2 (`debian/rules' - the main building script):
>
> `binary-arch' builds the binary packages
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
> Any hint ?
for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data, and just made
the packages use renamed config files.
it makes things easy
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>
> > `binary-arch' builds the binary packages which are specific to a
> > particular architecture, and `binary-indep' builds those which are
> > not.
>
> Thanks for pointing me to /usr/share/doc/debhelp
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 07:18:00PM +0200, Sebastien Chaumat wrote:
>
> Ok I'll find 2 tests machine.
>
You also may use User mode Linux to play with virtual Debian machine
Rémi Perrot
PGP signature
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> >to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> >solutions in Debian when two packages share the same file.
> >
> >cu
> >Adrian
>
> I'm just looking for the 'better
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:42:58AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:22:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I just adopted xabacus.
> >
> > It conflicts with xmabacus because both try to install
> > the same config file /etc/X11/app-defaults/Abacus.
> >
> maybe us
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:11:48PM -0700, Brett Cundal wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > This is the message I got from A. Bunk who handed me the package :
> >
> > >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > >to re
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:30:13PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 03:06:26AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > I'm just looking for the 'better solutions' he mentions but still clueless.
> > Any hint ?
>
> for lib{pam,nss}-ldap i used debconf to share the common data,
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:49:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > >It's your package. One thing you could do when you start working on it is
> > >to remove the conflict between xabacus and xmabacus - there are better
> > >solutions in Debian when two packages share the sa
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> It seems the best solution indeed. Is there a way to know if a package has been
>purged ? dpkg --test-purge ?
You'll have to play with dpkg -s | grep Status: I guess
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Hi,
If I have uploaded experimental pacakages to my homepage, how do I make the
required Packages and Sources files so that the packages can be used with
apt-get ?
viral
--
I'll see you on the Dark Side of the Moon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Andrew D Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm working my way through a peculiar install (the box is a briq from
> Total Impact http://www.totalimpact.com ). The box is booting over the
> network and I haven't been able to run dbootstrap.
What architecture?
> I've managed to
> activate and
65 matches
Mail list logo
