Hi,
The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
to do an upload to fix several bugs, there have been no upstream
changes (I think it's
Just use the old one from ftp.debian.org.
If the .orig.tar.gz already exists in .. (relative to the source dir), a new
one won't be generated.
-brad
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:15:46PM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but o
On 20010107T171546+1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> Should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org
It would be closed as a non-bug.
> or alter the filesize and
> md5sum in the .changes and .dsc, resign and upload that?
Don't do that. It would probably make your upload broken.
What I suggest is th
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:32:17 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
>> that are in the source?
>
>Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never shou
On 7 Jan 2001, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jason,
> The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
> my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
> been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
> to do an upload to fix
In creating an unofficial Debian Package on a Potato system I get the
following lintian info message, which I don't know how to get rid of:
$ lintian -iIv PACKAGE.dsc
...
I: PACKAGE source: unknown-field-in-dsc format
...
Checking the deb-file alone produces no info message so I supsect the
follo
Hi,
Could someone please upload
debian-mirror 1.0-1
deb ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
deb-src ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/dists/unstable/main/[source/binary-i386]/
Thanks.
MfG
Goswin
Hi, all. I have a question about the subject of the following message.
I built a freeradius binary .deb and ...powerpc.changes on a powerpc. Is
the changes file really architecture-specific? I didn't think so, but the
name is wierd.
- chad
--
Ch
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apt-get source byacc
> and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there a good reason for a newly
> compressed tarball?)
The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use
cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about
copying th
> " " == Jason Henry Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> apt-get source byacc and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there
>> a good reason for a newly compressed tarball?)
> The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer
> to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it.
>
> It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author
> without any changes so that the md5sum compares to an
Michael Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In creating an unofficial Debian Package on a Potato system I get the
>following lintian info message, which I don't know how to get rid of:
>
>$ lintian -iIv PACKAGE.dsc
>...
>I: PACKAGE source: unknown-field-in-dsc format
>...
>
>Checking the deb-file
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, all. I have a question about the subject of the following message.
>I built a freeradius binary .deb and ...powerpc.changes on a powerpc. Is
>the changes file really architecture-specific? I didn't think so, but the
>name is wierd.
The .changes file
> " " == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the
>> pointer to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild
>> it.
>>
>> It should be the original file dow
On 20010107T171546+1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> Should I file a bug against ftp.debian.org
It would be closed as a non-bug.
> or alter the filesize and
> md5sum in the .changes and .dsc, resign and upload that?
Don't do that. It would probably make your upload broken.
What I suggest is t
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:32:17 +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
>> that are in the source?
>
>Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never sho
On 7 Jan 2001, Jason Henry Parker wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jason,
> The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
> my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
> been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
> to do an upload to fix
In creating an unofficial Debian Package on a Potato system I get the
following lintian info message, which I don't know how to get rid of:
$ lintian -iIv PACKAGE.dsc
...
I: PACKAGE source: unknown-field-in-dsc format
...
Checking the deb-file alone produces no info message so I supsect the
foll
Hi,
Could someone please upload
debian-mirror 1.0-1
deb ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
deb-src ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/ unstable main
ftp://rut.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/dists/unstable/main/[source/binary-i386]/
Thanks.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUB
Hi, all. I have a question about the subject of the following message.
I built a freeradius binary .deb and ...powerpc.changes on a powerpc. Is
the changes file really architecture-specific? I didn't think so, but the
name is wierd.
- chad
--
C
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apt-get source byacc
> and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there a good reason for a newly
> compressed tarball?)
The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was that I use
cvs-buildpackage to make builds easier; if I have to futz about
copying t
> " " == Jason Henry Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> apt-get source byacc and you have the old .tar.gz. (Or is there
>> a good reason for a newly compressed tarball?)
> The reason I wanted to try a recompressed tarball was tha
On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the pointer
> to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild it.
>
> It should be the original file downloaded from the upstream author
> without any changes so that the md5sum compares to a
Michael Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In creating an unofficial Debian Package on a Potato system I get the
>following lintian info message, which I don't know how to get rid of:
>
>$ lintian -iIv PACKAGE.dsc
>...
>I: PACKAGE source: unknown-field-in-dsc format
>...
>
>Checking the deb-file
Chad Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, all. I have a question about the subject of the following message.
>I built a freeradius binary .deb and ...powerpc.changes on a powerpc. Is
>the changes file really architecture-specific? I didn't think so, but the
>name is wierd.
The .changes fil
> " " == tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 7 Jan 2001, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>> The orig.tar.gz file should be pristine (does someone have the
>> pointer to the policiy about this?). Basically NEVER rebuild
>> it.
>>
>> It should be the original file do
26 matches
Mail list logo
