On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:44:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been reading archives of debian-new-maintainer and debian-mentor, and
> I'm somewhat confused about which older GPG keys have problems. If I have
> a key
>
> ~/Program_Source $ gpg --list-keys "David Starner"
> pub 1024D/
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:20:33PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
> optimized libc6 libraries.
>
> A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
>
> I've a solution :-)
>
> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Ho
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I've a solution :-)
>>
>> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC> libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Chris
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I've a solution :-)
> >>
> >> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
>
> BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
> BC> l
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Which is the difference ?
BC> The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC> optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC> for me to add your one package, than for your
Hi, Mentor-helpers ;-)
As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
write/modify the config file in debian/postinst, and don't list them
in debian/con
Hi,
Sometime a ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' fails to print out the package
which owns it. Could you please tell me why this may happen? i.e. what
is the possible reason(s) for it? Thanks!
Another question is, ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' is notably slower than
``grep /usr/bin/f /var/lib/dpkg/info
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:45:25PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> It's still writing "drew" into the Followup-To header. I'll try unsetting
> the mutt variable this time.
Try:
set nofollowup_to
I think this might be buggy, in that it's prolly never correct to send a
'MFT: UserWithNoMailDomain' .
No, not the adult diapers.
What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the two
packages and I only need liblapack.
Unfortunately, the man p
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
> What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
> wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
> of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the
> Junichi Uekawa writes:
ju> In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum
veritate scripsit :
>>> What I would like to do is control the behaviour of
>>> dpkg-shlibdeps wrt one library. In particular, I would like
>>> it to use lapack instead of atlas
Hi!
I am currently waiting for DAM approval in NM queue.
The program I packaged is named 'potool'. It is a program and a
few scripts that greatly ease editing editing of po files,
using your favourite editor.
The package (lintian clean) is waiting for you at
http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porrid
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:11:32 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
> Actually, it doesn't have to be this complicated. I had just made my
> debian/shlibs.local file with the wrong soname. After looking at
> atlas2.shlibs, I was able to correct it. Just for future referen
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:44:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been reading archives of debian-new-maintainer and debian-mentor, and
> I'm somewhat confused about which older GPG keys have problems. If I have
> a key
>
> ~/Program_Source $ gpg --list-keys "David Starner"
> pub 1024D
Hi,
I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
optimized libc6 libraries.
A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
I've a solution :-)
Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
Any other idea ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:20:33PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a bug report #79224 against memprof who doesn't work anymore with
> optimized libc6 libraries.
>
> A LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libc-2.2.so doesn't work.
>
> I've a solution :-)
>
> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
H
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> I've a solution :-)
>>
>> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
BC> libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
Which is the difference ?
Chri
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I've a solution :-)
> >>
> >> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
>
> BC> How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
> BC>
"BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Which is the difference ?
BC> The difference is that you have one package that conflicts with any of the
BC> optimized library packages I have. There going to be more, so it is easier
BC> for me to add your one package, than for your
Hi, Mentor-helpers ;-)
As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
write/modify the config file in debian/postinst, and don't list them
in debian/co
Hi,
Sometime a ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' fails to print out the package
which owns it. Could you please tell me why this may happen? i.e. what
is the possible reason(s) for it? Thanks!
Another question is, ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' is notably slower than
``grep /usr/bin/f /var/lib/dpkg/inf
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 01:45:25PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> It's still writing "drew" into the Followup-To header. I'll try unsetting
> the mutt variable this time.
Try:
set nofollowup_to
I think this might be buggy, in that it's prolly never correct to send a
'MFT: UserWithNoMailDomain' .
No, not the adult diapers.
What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the two
packages and I only need liblapack.
Unfortunately, the man
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
> What I would like to do is control the behaviour of dpkg-shlibdeps
> wrt one library. In particular, I would like it to use lapack instead
> of atlas2 because there is about a 5 Mb difference between the
> Junichi Uekawa writes:
ju> In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:06:23 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum
veritate scripsit :
>>> What I would like to do is control the behaviour of
>>> dpkg-shlibdeps wrt one library. In particular, I would like
>>> it to use lapack instead of atla
Hi!
I am currently waiting for DAM approval in NM queue.
The program I packaged is named 'potool'. It is a program and a
few scripts that greatly ease editing editing of po files,
using your favourite editor.
The package (lintian clean) is waiting for you at
http://student.uci.agh.edu.pl/~porri
In Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:11:32 -0500 Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate
scripsit :
> Actually, it doesn't have to be this complicated. I had just made my
> debian/shlibs.local file with the wrong soname. After looking at
> atlas2.shlibs, I was able to correct it. Just for future refere
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:53:24PM +0800, Zhao Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth:
> Sometime a ``dpkg -S /usr/bin/f'' fails to print out the package
> which owns it. Could you please tell me why this may happen? i.e. what
> is the possible reason(s) for it? Thanks!
Most likely /usr/bin/
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:20:02PM +0800, Zhao Wei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake forth:
> As read from packaging-manual, there're two ways to handle
> system specific config files, one to list them in debian/conffiles,
> the other is (optionally write a /usr/bin/pkgxxxconfig to aid) to
> write/modify
30 matches
Mail list logo
