On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:32:23AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a bugreport for a package which is solved in a new
> version. and the bug report told me that it is fixed in the new
> package. it's a woody package but compiled for potato but
> shouldn't be a problem because it only
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sys
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will try and get everything working
later on today.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/linux/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or see
sorry about that.
On 20001023T101336+0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> > I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> > set of options.
Hi,
suppose sometime in the changelog, an empty entry line, or an obvious typo,
then is it proper to fix it or preserve it? (in case there is no historical
reason to preserve it like, say, in the doc-debian case where there are some
old entries back from the year 1996. :-)
Best regards,
zhaoway
On 23-Oct-2000 zhaoway wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> suppose sometime in the changelog, an empty entry line, or an obvious typo,
> then is it proper to fix it or preserve it? (in case there is no historical
> reason to preserve it like, say, in the doc-debian case where there are some
> old entries back fr
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
>> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
>
>> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
>
> libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> well (look at the .di
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sy
Thanks for all the suggestions. I will try and get everything working
later on today.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh ** Registration Number: 151826, http://counter.li.org **
Need Epson Stylus Utilities? http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~rl117/linux/
For GPG Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] or see
On 20001023T101336+0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> > I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> > set of options
Hi,
suppose sometime in the changelog, an empty entry line, or an obvious typo,
then is it proper to fix it or preserve it? (in case there is no historical
reason to preserve it like, say, in the doc-debian case where there are some
old entries back from the year 1996. :-)
Best regards,
zhaoway
On 23-Oct-2000 zhaoway wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> suppose sometime in the changelog, an empty entry line, or an obvious typo,
> then is it proper to fix it or preserve it? (in case there is no historical
> reason to preserve it like, say, in the doc-debian case where there are some
> old entries back f
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Joergen Haegg wrote:
>
>> > You haven't corrected the clean rules yet, so the diff.gz still contains
>> > loads of unnecessary stuff.
>
>> Ok, done, couldn't see any errors.
>
> libio-stty-perl is corrected, libexpect-perl not. You should do that as
> well (look at the .d
sorry about that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15 matches
Mail list logo
