I am adopting wxgtk2.1 from Brian Bassett and bring it up to the latest
upstream version. Lintian reports:
E: wxgtk2.1: pkg-without-shlibs-has-shlibs-control-file
but the package does indeed contain a shared library
(/usr/lib/libwx_gtk-2.1.so.11.0.0). Why isn't lintian recognizing it as
such?
I'
On 30-Nov-99 Ben Darnell wrote:
> I am adopting wxgtk2.1 from Brian Bassett and bring it up to the latest
> upstream version. Lintian reports:
> E: wxgtk2.1: pkg-without-shlibs-has-shlibs-control-file
> but the package does indeed contain a shared library
> (/usr/lib/libwx_gtk-2.1.so.11.0.0). Wh
*Raul Miller wrote:
> PDL currently contains R. If you want to get r-pdl out before
> the freeze, that's excellent. I'll want to pull R from pdl before
> the freeze if you do that.
This fixes the problem. The documentation has an error in it.
use PDL;
use PDL::R;
...
I omitted the line 'use
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 06:05:22PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 30-Nov-99 Ben Darnell wrote:
> > I am adopting wxgtk2.1 from Brian Bassett and bring it up to the latest
> > upstream version. Lintian reports:
> > E: wxgtk2.1: pkg-without-shlibs-has-shlibs-control-file
> > but the packa
Lintian first dumps the obj info of the file by running "objdump" on it.
Then the output is searched for the string "SONAME"
Here's the regex: /^\s*SONAME\s*(\S+)/o
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:20:12PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> I am adopting wxgtk2.1 from Brian Bassett and bring it up to the
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:11:58PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Lintian first dumps the obj info of the file by running "objdump" on it.
> Then the output is searched for the string "SONAME"
> Here's the regex: /^\s*SONAME\s*(\S+)/o
Yes, I've found that. What causes objdump to print or n
*that* I don't know...
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 11:27:24PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:11:58PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Lintian first dumps the obj info of the file by running "objdump" on it.
> > Then the output is searched for the string "SONAME"
> > Here's
Darren O. Benham wrote:
> *that* I don't know...
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 11:27:24PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 08:11:58PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > > Lintian first dumps the obj info of the file by running "objdump" on it.
> > > Then the output is searched
Brian May wrote:
> That makes more sense. dh_make in slink doesn't do this though, potato
> might be different.
Debhelper's example rules files have always done this, though I cannot speak
for dh-make.
> My observation (nothing more/less, however, probably a good idea
> in general):
>
> This mea
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 09:58:55PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote:
> debian/rules to not run dh_shlibdeps on the -dev package, but it didn't
> fix it. Also, I made a mistake in my previous report - the
> pkg-without-shlibs-has-shlibs-control-file error occurs in both the
> wxgtk2.1 and wxgtk2.1-dev pack
Thanks for the help with the wxgtk2.1 SONAME problem. Now I'm working
on python-wxwin. It requires an untarred copy of the wxgtk2.1 source
(actually, the standard way of building wxPython is to untar it inside
the wxgtk tree, but that can be avoided with symlinks). What is the
proper way to spec
On 30-Nov-99 Ben Darnell wrote:
> Thanks for the help with the wxgtk2.1 SONAME problem. Now I'm working
> on python-wxwin. It requires an untarred copy of the wxgtk2.1 source
> (actually, the standard way of building wxPython is to untar it inside
> the wxgtk tree, but that can be avoided with s
Ben Darnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the help with the wxgtk2.1 SONAME problem. Now I'm working
> on python-wxwin. It requires an untarred copy of the wxgtk2.1 source
> (actually, the standard way of building wxPython is to untar it inside
> the wxgtk tree, but that can be avoide
13 matches
Mail list logo
