Can anybody tell me what this means, and what to do about it?
W: rosegarden: shared-lib-without-dependency-information
usr/X11R6/lib/rosegarden/petal/Petal.so
E: rosegarden: shlib-with-non-pic-code
usr/X11R6/lib/rosegarden/petal/Petal.so
On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > debmake decided to run configure --prefix=/usr, should i add a
> > --bindir=/usr/bin/X11 argument to it?
> use "--prefix=/usr/X11R6", and that'll get rid of the need for --bindir
> and all the rest.
but that would put data in /usr/X11
> i got an identical menu.ex from both methods, except that debmake
> produced:
> > cat tmp/DEBIAN/postinst
> #!/bin/sh -e
> if [ -x /usr/bin/update-menus ] ; then update-menus ; fi
>
> whereas dh_make produced one that did this (from memory):
> #!/bin/sh
> if test -x /usr/bin/update-menus ; then
> On Sat, 20 Mar 1999 19:46:19 -0500 (EST), Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Will> Can anybody tell me what this means, and what to do about it?
Will> W: rosegarden: shared-lib-without-dependency-information
Will> usr/X11R6/lib/rosegarden/petal/Petal.so
Will> E: rosegarden: shli
> but that would put data in /usr/X11R6/share and that would be bad..
Oh. Right. I'm facing a similar problem with Rosegarden. Probably I'll
have to edit the configure.in to install that stuff in /usr/share instead.
> whereas dh_make produced one that did this (from memory):
> #!/bin/sh
> if te
Will Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anybody tell me what this means, and what to do about it?
>
> W: rosegarden: shared-lib-without-dependency-information
> usr/X11R6/lib/rosegarden/petal/Petal.so
If the code in Petal.so uses any C library calls, it has to say so for
Debian. (So
> On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 05:44:11PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > > debmake decided to run configure --prefix=/usr, should i add a
> > > --bindir=/usr/bin/X11 argument to it?
> > use "--prefix=/usr/X11R6", and that'll get rid of the need for --bindir
> > and all the rest.
>
> but that would put da
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > $ cd package-1.1
> > $ zcat ../package_1.0-1.diff.gz | patch -p1
> > $ chmod +x debian/rules
> >
> > just edit the changelog
>
> BTW quickest editing of changelog is done with `dch -v uv-dr` where uv is
> upstream version and dr is Debian revision (1.1-1 in this case).
I'
On Sat, Mar 20, 1999 at 10:16:30PM -0500, Will Lowe wrote:
> > whereas dh_make produced one that did this (from memory):
> > #!/bin/sh
> > if test -x /usr/bin/update-menus ; then update-menus ; fi
> > if test -x /usr/bin/update-menus ; then update-menus ; fi
> Whoa. That's weird.
it's the progra
> First one: it means you have a shared library in your package without
> providing dependency information about it. In this case it shouldn't
> cause a problem because the shared object looks like it'll only be
> used by rosegarden.
Aha. Fixed, thanks.
Can anybody give me a rundown on the poli
> First one: it means you have a shared library in your package without
> providing dependency information about it. In this case it shouldn't
How do I go about creaing this info?
> Second one: shared library objects are compiled in a special way
> (command line option -fPIC) so that they can be
On Sun, Mar 21, 1999 at 09:14:32AM +1100, Gus wrote:
> i've got an X program that i'm packaging.. at present it only has an X
> interface, but that will change in later versions..
>
> debmake decided to run configure --prefix=/usr, should i add a
> --bindir=/usr/bin/X11 argument to it?
>
> (or s
12 matches
Mail list logo
