Re: Conventions for library naming

1999-02-19 Thread Mitch Blevins
Marco Kuhlmann wrote: > Mitch Blevins wrote (1999-02-17, 16:08): > > > > I found out that the script checks for libgmp2.so, while the > > ^^ > > Are you sure you don't mean that the script is checking for libgmp.so? > > This is the problem I ran int

Licensing question

1999-02-19 Thread Remco van de Meent
Hi, Would this license (the one that comes with MajorCool, a webinterface to the Majordomo package) fit in non-free? I think so, right? --- THE "NO-FRILLS" LICENSING AGREEMENT 1. This software is copyright the author and NCR Corp. 2. Ma

Re: Licensing question

1999-02-19 Thread Jules Bean
On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Remco van de Meent wrote: > Hi, > > Would this license (the one that comes with MajorCool, a webinterface to the > Majordomo package) fit in non-free? I think so, right? > > --- > THE "NO-FRILLS" LICENSING AGREEMENT

Re: Licensing question

1999-02-19 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Feb 19, 1999 at 01:59:30PM +0100, Remco van de Meent wrote: > Would this license (the one that comes with MajorCool, a webinterface to the > Majordomo package) fit in non-free? I think so, right? It sure can go to non-free, but what about main? Look: > 4. Non-commercial use of this softwa

RE: Licensing question

1999-02-19 Thread Shaleh
On 19-Feb-99 Remco van de Meent wrote: > Hi, > > Would this license (the one that comes with MajorCool, a webinterface to the > Majordomo package) fit in non-free? I think so, right? Actually sounds ok to me. > > --- > THE "NO-FRILLS"