Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-29 Thread Michael Spang
Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:25:53PM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You're right. With the jars unpacked, most of the data is the same; whether or not some crazy [sym]linking would be required to accomodate the files that do differ I have yet to find out.

Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:25:53PM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right. With the jars unpacked, most of the data is the same; > whether or not some crazy [sym]linking would be required to accomodate > the files that do differ I have yet to find out. I'll prepare a pack

Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Michael Spang
Mike Hommey wrote: On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 03:25:54AM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) There are several possible courses of action: * merge the Seamonkey version into mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper, with a note in a description that Seamonkey support is now included

Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 03:25:54AM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > There are several possible courses of action: >* merge the Seamonkey version into mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper, > with a note in a description that Seamonkey support is now included >* package the d

webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Michael Spang
My package for the web developer extension to Firefox was recently accepted into the unstable archive thanks to the sponsorship of Frank Lichtenheld. There is a version of this extension for Seamonkey as well and I see no reason not to package it. AFAICS there is no sharable data between them,