On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 10:34:01PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Chow Loong Jin
> > ^^ Refer to the thread about -Wl,--as-needed in debian-mentors.
>
> I can't find this thread .. can you send a link please
It started with message 49c1af19.30...@gmail.com
Cheers,
Hauke
signature.asc
Des
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > I have some warning messages during build a package.
> > Can somebody please look at them if they are serious?
> >
> > ###
> >
> > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbo
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> I have some warning messages during build a package.
> Can somebody please look at them if they are serious?
>
> ###
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by
> debian/libslv2
Hello mentors,
I have some warning messages during build a package.
Can somebody please look at them if they are serious?
###
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by
debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used
Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 5 August 2008 14:02, Richard Hurt wrote:
> > W: : script-non-executable -- Since this is a scripted
> > web application (RoR) there are quite a few "scripts" that are not
> > executable directly in the shell. Can I turn this warning off for
On Aug 5, 2008, at 6:34 PM| Aug 5, 2008, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
Except, perhaps, from scripts which end up installed in the
directories
in the path. For scripts that are not in the path (and even if the
execute bit set can only be executed with extra measures from the
user)
it should
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 01:56:59 Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
> >> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
> >
> > I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
>
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joey Hess wrote:
>> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>>> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
>>> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
>> I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
> Then maybe the linti
Joey Hess wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
>> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
>> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
>>
>
> I'm not aware of any such thing in policy
Then maybe the lintian warning could be removed.
--
BOFH excus
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> If the policy suggestion that leads to that lintian warning is so
> unreasonable, it might as well be taken off the policy.
I'm not aware of any such thing in policy.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess wrote:
> Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
>
>> If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
>> #! line from them. That should make the warning go away.
>> It would be better to talk with upstream so he does that.
>>
>
> If I were upstream and was pestered by a distr
Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
>> W: : package-contains-empty-directory -- Some of these are
>> necessary (cache, assets, etc.) and some aren't (test). Can I turn
>> these off?
> Yes, add override for these.
Lintian does not warn abou
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
> #! line from them. That should make the warning go away.
> It would be better to talk with upstream so he does that.
If I were upstream and was pestered by a distribution to remove the
hashbang lines t
Hi
Dne Tue, 5 Aug 2008 08:02:28 -0400
Richard Hurt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
> Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
>
> W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
> long
Hi Richard,
On Tuesday 5 August 2008 14:02, Richard Hurt wrote:
> I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
> Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
>
> W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
> long lines are now OK. I am
Richard Hurt escreveu:
W: : script-non-executable -- Since this is a scripted web
application (RoR) there are quite a few "scripts" that are not
executable directly in the shell. Can I turn this warning off for
these files?
If the scripts are not directly executable, you can remove the
#!
I am getting quite a few lintian warnings that I would like to quell.
Do we have any best practices on how to deal with these messages?
W: : debian-copyright-line-too-long -- As I understand it
long lines are now OK. I am following the new, proposed guidelines
for the copyright file (htt
17 matches
Mail list logo
