On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 05:12, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
> number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
> updated changelog file)?
I'm not a DD, but I believe maintaining a package for Debian a
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 05:12, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
> number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
> updated changelog file)?
I'm not a DD, but I believe maintaining a package for Debian a
If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
updated changelog file)?
tia
zen
If the upstream readme file has, in this case an out of date version
number, should I just leave that as is (it has a comprehensive and
updated changelog file)?
tia
zen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) writes:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 12:55:41PM +0100, Jens Ritter wrote:
> > May I change the upstream readme to include the information from the
> > source file (with notes, that I have modified it, of course) ?
>
> As long as you don't
ut will be correct. Microsoft.
>
>
> however in a Source File there´s a much more valuable description
> with Credits, how the program renders some values etc.
>
> May I change the upstream readme to include the information from the
> s
more valuable description
with Credits, how the program renders some values etc.
May I change the upstream readme to include the information from the
source file (with notes, that I have modified it, of course) ?
Else, what shall I do?
Thanks in advance,
Jens
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
7 matches
Mail list logo
