On Fri, 15 Jun 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: Adam Borowski
> > To: 901584-d...@bugs.debian.org
> > Cc:
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:37:07 +0200
> > Subject: Re: Bug#901584: RFS: flameshot/0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1
> > On Fri, Jun 15, 201
Hello,
On Fri, Jun 15 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> 2. and that Debian Maintainer asks another Debian Developer to open an
> RT ticket to get the uid into the backports ACL and wait till the
> ticket is finished. Note that non-DDs have no access to RT system thus
> a sponsorship of RT ticket from ot
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Adam Borowski
> To: 901584-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 15:37:07 +0200
> Subject: Re: Bug#901584: RFS: flameshot/0.5.1+git20180601-1~bpo9+1
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:04:31AM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > I am look
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Are there any problem in uploading packages built inside that chroot?
It should be fine. In fact that is a recommended practice. It
prevents flavor from the developer's machine leaking into the build.
The 'pbuilder' package is very nice for manag
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 19:56 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> So, you are worried.
> Worried about not being i386 enough.
>
> I say: Screw i386 !
Fine to say that, but Ubuntu is screaming ahead of Debian
here -- they actually support amd64, Debian doesn't.
--
John Skaller
Download Felix: http:
hich I set
> up an i386 debian unstable.
>
> Are there any problem in uploading packages built inside that chroot?
>
> The only strange thing I notice on binaries built there is that ldd
> reports a dynamic dependency on "linux-gate.so.1" which is not there for
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.07.2005, at 22:08, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I was also wondering, can't you just use a .d.o machine to compile the
package, uploading also to some other .d.o machine (incoming, or
ftp-master, or whatever it might be).
You could not compile most o
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:03:02PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07.07.2005, at 19:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >If you have a non ia32 system, then show that and be proud of it.
>
> Well at least it should not be possible to upload amd64 binar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07.07.2005, at 19:56, Geert Stappers wrote:
If you have a non ia32 system, then show that and be proud of it.
Well at least it should not be possible to upload amd64 binary
packages to the main Debian incoming as the port is unknown to katie.
t in which I set
> up an i386 debian unstable.
>
> Are there any problem in uploading packages built inside that chroot?
>
> The only strange thing I notice on binaries built there is that ldd
> reports a dynamic dependency on "linux-gate.so.1" which is not there for
> b
The machine I used to create debian packages ceased to work last week.
The only machine I have ATM to do debian work is an amd64 box with the
"unofficial" port of debian. I've set up an ia32 chroot in which I set
up an i386 debian unstable.
Are there any problem in uploading packag
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my debian.org
> > address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there is no key of mine
> > (old or
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
>
> > Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my
> > debian.org address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but
> > there is no key of mine (old or new) in the debian
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:35:14PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> Hmm, actually I just added a new userid to my key yesterday (my debian.org
> address) and I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but there is no key of mine
> (old or new) in the debian keyring just yet.. Should I have first waited
> for t
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 07:07:06PM +1200, Carey Evans wrote:
> Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:45:35AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Norbert Veber wrote:
> > Hi..
> >
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but I not
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:45:35AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Norbert Veber wrote:
> > Hi..
> >
> > I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> > having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> > created a changes file, but I not
Norbert Veber wrote:
> Hi..
>
> I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> created a changes file, but I noticed that the changes files in Incoming on
> master.debian.org also have some
Norbert Veber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
> having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
> created a changes file, but I noticed that the changes files in Incoming on
> master.debian.org als
Hi..
I made a new version of the xinetd package (xinetd2.2.1-4.deb), but I am
having dificulty locating the guidelines for uploading new packages. I have
created a changes file, but I noticed that the changes files in Incoming on
master.debian.org also have some extra fields including the descri
On Mon, 25 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Didn't you know that?
>
> :r /var/spool/mail/jk
I give in!
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 25, 1998 at 09:58:19AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Using generic names is not a bad thing, claiming them is.
> > > Maybe you should have a look at update-alternatives.
> >
> > update-alternatives will only work for programs that perform a
> > similar task, such as n editors,
On Sun, 24 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 04:20:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Using generic names is not a bad thing, claiming them is.
> > Maybe you should have a look at update-alternatives.
>
> update-alternatives will only work for programs that perfo
On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> ---Reply on mail from Marcus Brinkmann about Uploading packages
>
> > On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
>
> > The reason I ask is becasue it is depreciated to use dictionary
---Reply on mail from Marcus Brinkmann about Uploading packages
> On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
>
>> Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
>> record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
>
> Hello Bart!
>
> I&#x
On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 04:20:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> >
> > > Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
> > > record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sampl
On Sun, May 24, 1998 at 04:20:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
> > > record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
> > I'm a bit scared to ask, because I don't want to start a thread, but are
> > these the names of the executables?
On Sun, 24 May 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
>
> > Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
> > record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
>
> Hello Bart!
>
> I'm a bit scared to ask, because I don't want to
On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
> record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
Hello Bart!
I'm a bit scared to ask, because I don't want to start a thread, but are
these the names of the executables?
On Sat, May 23, 1998 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I made a package (sound-recorder_0.04-1_i386.deb). This is to be my first
> upload. My question is:
>
> Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
> record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
>
> Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 23 May 1998, Bart Warmerdam wrote:
> Where do i upload it? /home/Debian/ftp/private/project/Incoming
> because of the freeze of hamm? [...]
Yes, but not because of the freeze of hamm :-), but because that is the
upload directory for *all* uploads. An au
Hi,
I made a package (sound-recorder_0.04-1_i386.deb). This is to be my first
upload. My question is:
Its a direct-to-disk recorder and contains:
record (no cdrom support), cdrom-record and play-sample
Can i use this name (same as tar-ball) for the package or do you need it to be
the sa
32 matches
Mail list logo
