Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:13:43AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find an

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:13:43AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find a

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Goswin! You wrote: > You can set whatever depends during build, just like the > ${shlibs:Depends} does. Ah, that's a solution that I didn't think about. Thanks! -- Kind regards, +---+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Goswin! You wrote: > You can set whatever depends during build, just like the > ${shlibs:Depends} does. Ah, that's a solution that I didn't think about. Thanks! -- Kind regards, +---+ | Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sai

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Goswin! You wrote: >> Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it >> there yesterday. > You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time > relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the sam

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Goswin! You wrote: > Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it there > yesterday. You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the same procedure doesn't work for an ordinary Depends relation. -- Kind regards, +

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Goswin! You wrote: >> Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it >> there yesterday. > You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time > relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the sa

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-06 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Goswin! You wrote: > Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it there > yesterday. You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the same procedure doesn't work for an ordinary Depends relation. -- Kind regards, +---

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a > different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc > does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for > sparc). Is this possible? I haven't be

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Goswin Brederlow
> " " == Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a > different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc > does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for > sparc). Is this possible? I haven't b

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find anything abou

seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been able to find anything about this in the packaging manual. -- Kind regards, +---

Re: seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi! > > For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy > for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, > which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been > able to find anything abo

seperate dependencies for architectures

2001-01-05 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp, which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been able to find anything about this in the packaging manual. -- Kind regards, +--