On 2006-06-21, Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is a Debian-specific issue, due to the upstream libtool maintainer
> having a disagreement with Debian about rpath. He considers it a feature
> which should always be used, we consider it a feature which may be useful in
> some spec
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Williams wrote:
>> $ lintian pilot-qof_0.0.10-1_amd64.deb
>> W: pilot-qof: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/pilot-qof /usr/lib64
>
> Could this be a recurrence of #268152 ?
> libffi.la: wrong libdir setting
> (originally found in libtool 1:3.
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 10:37:28AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> However, a recent upgrade (I suspect to libtool or gcc) on amd64 has
> meant that I now get architecture-specific lintian errors involving
> rpath :
>
> $ lintian pilot-qof_0.0.10-1_amd64.deb
> W: pilot-qof: binary-or-shlib-defines-r
Neil Williams wrote:
> $ lintian pilot-qof_0.0.10-1_amd64.deb
> W: pilot-qof: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath ./usr/bin/pilot-qof /usr/lib64
Could this be a recurrence of #268152 ?
libffi.la: wrong libdir setting
(originally found in libtool 1:3.4.1-7 in 2004.)
#268152 was also on amd64.
http://bugs
I have two binary packages (one already in Debian - pilot-qof - and one
still in development called cashutil) that previously built successfully
on amd64. Each package still builds successfully (i.e. no lintian or
linda errors) on powerpc and i386.
Test packages are available from here:
deb http:/
5 matches
Mail list logo
