yeah, it sounds great to me. This dependency has now been completely removed.
Its building fine without it.
thanks,
stew
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:45:52PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > > * changed Build-depends from automaken to automake1.4 (Closes:
> > > #289743)
> [...]
>
> Isn't
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:45:52PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > * changed Build-depends from automaken to automake1.4 (Closes:
> > #289743)
[...]
Isn't running automake at build time frowned upon anyway?
I think the recommended way to do it is running automake at source package
creation t
Mike O'Connor wrote on 12/01/2005 18:45:
ratpoison (1.3.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* changed Build-depends from automaken to automake1.4 (Closes: #289743)
* repackaged as a non-debian native package
* added emacsen scripts to install the ratpoison.el from upstream
* changed dh_installmanpag
> (cc'd #289743 as this info is important for anyone looking at this bug)
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:45:52PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > * changed Build-depends from automaken to automake1.4 (Closes: #289743)
>
> If it doesn't work with other automake, you _need_ to make sure this
> w
(cc'd #289743 as this info is important for anyone looking at this bug)
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 12:45:52PM -0500, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> * changed Build-depends from automaken to automake1.4 (Closes: #289743)
If it doesn't work with other automake, you _need_ to make sure this
won't happen, i.e
The ratpoison package seems to be neglectecd. I made an attempt to repackage
it, and I was going to send it to the maintainer to see if i can get a new
version uploaded, but since I haven't done much of this I was hoping to get
someone to look over my packaging before I send it to the maintaine
6 matches
Mail list logo
