Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Richard A. Hecker <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would suggest a little more patience. Days can quickly elapse when a >> person is busy. > OK, I meant that Lamont changed the file since my mail, but not changed > thi

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-04 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Richard A. Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> I would suggest a little more patience. Days can quickly elapse when a >> person is busy. > OK, I meant that Lamont changed the file since my mail, but not changed > thi

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread GCS
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Richard A. Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suggest a little more patience. Days can quickly elapse when a > person is busy. OK, I meant that Lamont changed the file since my mail, but not changed this. I have thought I am ignored (my mail is n

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread GCS
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 09:19:53AM -0700, Richard A. Hecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would suggest a little more patience. Days can quickly elapse when a > person is busy. OK, I meant that Lamont changed the file since my mail, but not changed this. I have thought I am ignored (my mail is

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread Richard A. Hecker
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] # See ChangeLog for history. %gradm: !ia64

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: >> # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL >> PROTECTED] >> # See ChangeLog for history. >> %gradm: !ia64 # [ANAIS] n

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread Richard A. Hecker
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] # See ChangeLog for history. %gradm: !ia64 # [ANA

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-03 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> # See ChangeLog for history. >> %gradm: !ia64 # [ANAIS] no su

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-01 Thread GCS
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > # See ChangeLog for history. > %gradm: !ia64 # [ANAIS] no support upstream, see #201769 I have wrote to

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-05-01 Thread GCS
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # Please email comments, corrections to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or [EMAIL PROTECTED] > # See ChangeLog for history. > %gradm: !ia64 # [ANAIS] no support upstream, see #201769 I have wrote to bo

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-04-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I maintain gradm for now, and I have noticed it does not built for ia64 > since a while. The previous maintainer had problems on it, but he has > re-enabled it long time ago (and debian/control still has 'Architecture: > any'); but not even a build attemp

Re: request for buildd not used problem

2004-04-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > I maintain gradm for now, and I have noticed it does not built for ia64 > since a while. The previous maintainer had problems on it, but he has > re-enabled it long time ago (and debian/control still has 'Architecture: > any'); but not even a build attemp

request for buildd not used problem

2004-04-25 Thread GCS
Hi, I maintain gradm for now, and I have noticed it does not built for ia64 since a while. The previous maintainer had problems on it, but he has re-enabled it long time ago (and debian/control still has 'Architecture: any'); but not even a build attempt pops up in the buildd logs[1]. Anyone may

request for buildd not used problem

2004-04-25 Thread GCS
Hi, I maintain gradm for now, and I have noticed it does not built for ia64 since a while. The previous maintainer had problems on it, but he has re-enabled it long time ago (and debian/control still has 'Architecture: any'); but not even a build attempt pops up in the buildd logs[1]. Anyone may