s on the bug you know of? Is it related to
build paths?
Varying build paths is not done for builds outside of unstable, and the
reproducible builds website exports its data based on testing instead.
The reason is simply because varying build paths causes still way too
many unreproducibi
Hello mentors,
I was reviewing one of my own packages on the QA page¹ and was surprised to
notice it gets full marks for CI/Rep. “Surprised? Isn’t that a good thing?” you
say. It’s surprising because I’ve been tracking an upstream bug that I *know*
makes this package’s build not-reproducible. C
Em Ter, 2016-07-19 às 12:42 +, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just
> > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for
> > it.
>
> You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control
Hi,
> Something failed somewhere in the second build, not in the package build
> itself but rather in the building script and was not properly detected
> as an infrastructure error (but rather as a FTBFS).
> I triggered another build of the package and not it has built
> successfully.
Thanks for
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I do not have a special interest in the package. Just
> a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for
> it.
You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control for that.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote:
> Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups
There are apparently at least two computers that run it regularly:
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dvbackup
Also, I assume Herbert has some reason for working on it.
--
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >
> > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > > it FTBFS with armhf o
Am 2016-07-19 11:29, schrieb Dominique Dumont:
On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote:
dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Not a user myself, but the package is already in the archive (it's
not an ITP), and I think reproducibility for _all_ of Debian is a
goal
* Dominique Dumont , 2016-07-19, 11:29:
dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB
thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose
than a DV camcorder ?
I certainly wouldn't recommend dvbackup for ma
On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote:
> dvbackup
Is this package worth the effort ?
Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb
drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV
camcorder ?
All the best
--
https:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> >
> > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > > it FTBFS with armhf o
Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>
> > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> > build was not tried again.
>
> Which package ?
dvbac
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
> it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
> build was not tried again.
Which package?
> I can do something about the status of the
> package on reproducible-builds ? Or just
>
Hi,
I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that
it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The
build was not tried again.
I did a build with harris (ssh) and the build
ran fine.
I can do something about the status of the
package on reproducible-builds ? Or just
wait for a new try by them ?
regards
14 matches
Mail list logo
