* Pau Garcia i Quiles [Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:11:44 +0100]:
> >> True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
> >> 6.7.8.2:
> >> A repackaged .orig.tar.gz
> >> [..]
> >> 4. should use -.orig as the name
> >> of the
.tar and make
>> > > tamper-checking more difficult, or not rename the directory in the
>> > > .orig.tar and make tamper-checking easier?
>> > You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
>
>> True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggest
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:58:36 +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > > You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
> > True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
> > 6.7.8.2:
> > 4. should use -.orig as the name
> > of the top-level directory in its tarball.
> > Is this recom
nd make tamper-checking easier?
> > You should not, dpkg-source copes well enough.
> True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
> 6.7.8.2:
> A repackaged .orig.tar.gz
> [..]
> 4. should use -.orig as the name
> of the top-level directory i
enough.
True, on the other hand the Developer's Reference suggests in
6.7.8.2:
A repackaged .orig.tar.gz
[..]
4. should use -.orig as the name
of the top-level directory in its tarball. This makes it possible
to distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones.
Is this rec
5 matches
Mail list logo
