Re: relibtoolizing when necessary

2006-01-16 Thread Florian Ernst
On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 06:02:34PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Florian Ernst [Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:52:26 +0100]: > > > I gave some pointers on relibtoolizing to my sponsees after vorlon > > called for improved library handling as mentioned in > >

Re: relibtoolizing when necessary (was: RFS: knmap -- Kde interface to nmap [uploaded])

2006-01-14 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Florian Ernst [Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:52:26 +0100]: > I gave some pointers on relibtoolizing to my sponsees after vorlon > called for improved library handling as mentioned in > . > Especially KDE applications seem to be prone to

Re: relibtoolizing when necessary (was: RFS: knmap -- Kde interface to nmap [uploaded])

2006-01-13 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Florian Ernst wrote: > > I thought I understood at least the reason to include diffs for a > > config.guess and config.sub. But IMHO relibtooling is only needed when > > certain libraries are in a state of transitions. Could you (or Florian (or You should always relibtooli

Re: relibtoolizing when necessary (was: RFS: knmap -- Kde interface to nmap [uploaded])

2006-01-13 Thread Claudio Moratti
On Friday 13 January 2006 21:52, Florian Ernst wrote: > Hello *, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:10:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: [cut] > Of course, maintainers shouldn't relibtoolize just for the sake of it, > but sometimes it's truly worth the effort. > > HTH, > Flo The situation was the same

relibtoolizing when necessary (was: RFS: knmap -- Kde interface to nmap [uploaded])

2006-01-13 Thread Florian Ernst
Hello *, On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:10:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: > On Friday 13 January 2006 19:40, Claudio Moratti wrote: > > On Friday 13 January 2006 15:48, Christoph Haas wrote: > > > debian/patches: [QUESTION/HINT] > > > You are changing a whole lot of the autoconf parts. Does this h