On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:01:15PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and
> > > got
> > > zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything
> > > even close, but it makes a bit of a mess.
> > If you wa
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:01:15PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > >
> > > I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> > > zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything
> > > even close, but it makes a bit of a mess.
> > If you want to
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:19:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
> >
> > I asked a variation on the
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 01:19:21AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
> >
> > I asked a variation on th
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
>
> I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> zero responses. Abor
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:07:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
>
> I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
> zero responses. Abo
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything even
close, but it makes a
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:29:18PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
I asked a variation on the same question on -devel a few weeks ago, and got
zero responses. Aborting in the preinst is the only way to do anything even
close, but it makes a
Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 01:12:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'm planning to have mirrormagic use debconf to ask the user if they want to
> delete the highscore files from the older version (which are incompatible
> from the new).
>
>
Sorry to nag. Has anyone got an answer to this question?
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 01:12:27AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I'm planning to have mirrormagic use debconf to ask the user if they want to
> delete the highscore files from the older version (which are incompatible
> from the new).
>
>
I'm planning to have mirrormagic use debconf to ask the user if they want to
delete the highscore files from the older version (which are incompatible
from the new).
Having a choice of Yes/No is clear, but it seemed to me it might be
appropriate to provide a third alternative, "Quit", which aborts
I'm planning to have mirrormagic use debconf to ask the user if they want to
delete the highscore files from the older version (which are incompatible
from the new).
Having a choice of Yes/No is clear, but it seemed to me it might be
appropriate to provide a third alternative, "Quit", which abort
12 matches
Mail list logo
