In Steve Robbins's email, 27-01-2001:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
[8< bobbit some quoted text 8<]
> At the very least, a single sentence at the top of the page
> that says "quality refers to the search, not the package"
> would be welcomed. Even better if t
In Steve Robbins's email, 27-01-2001:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
[8< bobbit some quoted text 8<]
> At the very least, a single sentence at the top of the page
> that says "quality refers to the search, not the package"
> would be welcomed. Even better if
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> >
> > > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
> > > Would
> > > you tell me how it counts? bug reports +
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> >
> > > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> > > you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintia
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
> > > Would
> > > you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
> >
> > Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the
> > package; t
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 03:21:41PM -0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> > > you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
> >
> > Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the
> > package; they re
zhaoway wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
> Would you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
file a bug on the website that it should be removed because it is misleading
or should be perhaps renamed to "relevance" or "score".
r
zhaoway wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
> Would you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
file a bug on the website that it should be removed because it is misleading
or should be perhaps renamed to "relevance" or "score".
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
>
> > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> > you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
>
> Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the
> package;
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the package; they refer to
the quality of the sear
Hi,
I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
Would you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
--
zhaoway
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
>
> > I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> > you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
>
> Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the
> package
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:56:07AM +0800, zhaoway wrote:
> I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package. Would
> you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
Those numbers have nothing to do with the quality of the package; they refer to
the quality of the sea
Hi,
I saw on package.d.o there is a quality percentage for each package.
Would you tell me how it counts? bug reports + lintian errors?
--
zhaoway
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
14 matches
Mail list logo