On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I heard it was a bug in apt-get; it needs "A | B" as it can't
> > select something itself to provide B. dpkg itself is fine.
>
> apt should probably just select the highest-priority p
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I heard it was a bug in apt-get; it needs "A | B" as it can't
> > select something itself to provide B. dpkg itself is fine.
>
> apt should probably just select the highest-priority
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has
> changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.)
See bug#112131 for example. I'm suprised I couldn't find an older bug
for this, actually.
> > I will read up on this
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has
> changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.)
See bug#112131 for example. I'm suprised I couldn't find an older bug
for this, actually.
> > I will read up on thi
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> Replaces: camlp4, ocaml-base
> Provides: camlp4 (= 3.04-3), ocaml-base (= 3.04-3)
I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has
changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.)
> > > I solved this with u
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:52:15PM +0100, Sven wrote:
> Replaces: camlp4, ocaml-base
> Provides: camlp4 (= 3.04-3), ocaml-base (= 3.04-3)
I don't think you can provide particular versions. Unless this has
changed in dpkg recently. (It's one of the most wanted features.)
> > > I solved this with
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:00:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
>
> Hi,
>
> > I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which
> > should
> > also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
> >
> > But this does not wo
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 02:00:37PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello, ...
>
> Hi,
>
> > I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should
> > also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
> >
> > But this does not work,
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
Hi,
> I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should
> also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
>
> But this does not work, when A is installed C refuses to install.
What does dpkg tell when you try to ins
Sven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello, ...
Hi,
> I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should
> also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
>
> But this does not work, when A is installed C refuses to install.
What does dpkg tell when you try to in
Hello, ...
I have a package A wich provides package B ( actually, B is a trimmed down
version of A which get replaced by A when A is installed).
I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should
also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
But this does not work
Hello, ...
I have a package A wich provides package B ( actually, B is a trimmed down
version of A which get replaced by A when A is installed).
I have a package C, which i wanted to make depend on B only, but which should
also work when A is installed, since A provides B.
But this does not wor
12 matches
Mail list logo
