Re: protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-13 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 12:51:34PM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 05:44:33PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:23:22PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > That said, yes, I would keep them open until potato is released. > > > > I thought protocol wa

Re: protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-12 Thread Brian May
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 05:44:33PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:23:22PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > That said, yes, I would keep them open until potato is released. > > I thought protocol was to close bugs fixed in the latest upload, > even though they are no

Re: protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-11 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 01:23:22PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > That said, yes, I would keep them open until potato is released. I thought protocol was to close bugs fixed in the latest upload, even though they are not fixed in stable? I suspect the BTS would have many more entries if we co

RE: protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-08 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 07-Oct-99 Dpk wrote: > I recently adopted dhcpcd, and have made 3 uploads to close almost 20 > bugs against the potato version, which includes daemons for both 2.0.x > and 2.(1, 2 ,and soon 3).x kernels. > > I am looking at the remaining bugs which are, for the most part, filed > against the s

protocol: closing bugs

1999-10-07 Thread Dpk
I recently adopted dhcpcd, and have made 3 uploads to close almost 20 bugs against the potato version, which includes daemons for both 2.0.x and 2.(1, 2 ,and soon 3).x kernels. I am looking at the remaining bugs which are, for the most part, filed against the slink version of dhcpcd, which only in