Hello!
I'm new on the list. I'm Sven Lauritzen from Hamburg/Germany.
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 07:45, sean finney wrote:
> i'm packaging sugarplum, an email harvester honeypot basically. in
> order to not trap legitimate web-spiders, i thought it'd be good to
> make the install of a robots.txt[1] in
Hello!
I'm new on the list. I'm Sven Lauritzen from Hamburg/Germany.
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 07:45, sean finney wrote:
> i'm packaging sugarplum, an email harvester honeypot basically. in
> order to not trap legitimate web-spiders, i thought it'd be good to
> make the install of a robots.txt[1] in
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:33:20PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Well if the docs is already there things are quite set already.
> Well low is a good priority for such things, I think. Maybe a little
> higher if you think it is more important.
okay, i think low is acceptable for this. now that i
Hi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:10:03AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:25:14PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > 1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
> >in the README.Debian file.
> > 2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask f
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:25:14PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
>in the README.Debian file.
> 2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask for
>where to install it.
the /usr/share/doc docs are already there,
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 05:33:20PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Well if the docs is already there things are quite set already.
> Well low is a good priority for such things, I think. Maybe a little
> higher if you think it is more important.
okay, i think low is acceptable for this. now that i
Hi
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:10:03AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:25:14PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > 1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
> >in the README.Debian file.
> > 2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask f
Hello
I have a simple solution (or two actually).
1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
in the README.Debian file.
2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask for
where to install it.
I think it is a really bad idea to install it in /var/www. Fir
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 03:25:14PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> 1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
>in the README.Debian file.
> 2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask for
>where to install it.
the /usr/share/doc docs are already there,
Hello
I have a simple solution (or two actually).
1) Document that robots.txt should be copied to the proper place
in the README.Debian file.
2) Tell the user to do that in a debconf box, or even to ask for
where to install it.
I think it is a really bad idea to install it in /var/www. Fir
heya mentors,
i'm packaging sugarplum, an email harvester honeypot basically. in
order to not trap legitimate web-spiders, i thought it'd be good to
make the install of a robots.txt[1] in /var/www happen by default if
possible, only i'm not sure i can/ought to really do that.
if i made it a conf
heya mentors,
i'm packaging sugarplum, an email harvester honeypot basically. in
order to not trap legitimate web-spiders, i thought it'd be good to
make the install of a robots.txt[1] in /var/www happen by default if
possible, only i'm not sure i can/ought to really do that.
if i made it a conf
12 matches
Mail list logo
