Re: packaging problems with openMSX

* Yves Teixeira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, Hi, > > Sorry if my english is rough - I'll try to make this text as clear as > possible. Please send any answer copied to me as I am > not a subscriber of this list. TIA. > > I've read the maint-guide and most of the debian policy regarding > pa

Re: packaging problems with openMSX

* Yves Teixeira ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, Hi, > > Sorry if my english is rough - I'll try to make this text as clear as > possible. Please send any answer copied to me as I am > not a subscriber of this list. TIA. > > I've read the maint-guide and most of the debian policy regarding > pa

Re: packaging problems with openMSX

* Yves Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031229 03:49]: > 1) What should one do when a software comes with files from different > authors with a different license? Should this license be explicit at > /usr/share/*/doc/copyright ? I believe debian/copyright (or whatever becomes /usr/share/doc/name/cop

Re: packaging problems with openMSX

* Yves Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031229 03:49]: > 1) What should one do when a software comes with files from different > authors with a different license? Should this license be explicit at > /usr/share/*/doc/copyright ? I believe debian/copyright (or whatever becomes /usr/share/doc/name/cop

packaging problems with openMSX

Hi, Sorry if my english is rough - I'll try to make this text as clear as possible. Please send any answer copied to me as I am not a subscriber of this list. TIA. I've read the maint-guide and most of the debian policy regarding packaging software. After that, a few doubts remain concerning the

packaging problems with openMSX

Hi, Sorry if my english is rough - I'll try to make this text as clear as possible. Please send any answer copied to me as I am not a subscriber of this list. TIA. I've read the maint-guide and most of the debian policy regarding packaging software. After that, a few doubts remain concerning the